ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (ENDO-CRT)

R

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Heart Failure

Treatments

Device: Targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02174289
ISROTH20092 (Other Grant/Funding Number)
2013PS003H

Details and patient eligibility

About

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for severe systolic heart failure with well documented benefits in symptom improvement and reduction of morbidity and mortality. However, upto 30% of patients do not respond to treatment despite fulfilling the recommended indications. Lack of clinical response may be the result of imperfect left ventricular lead placement in the veins around the heart with conventional techniques. Optimum lead placement may constrained by coronary venous anatomy and may overlie scarred heart muscle or may not be at the site of latest electrical depolarisation. In a further 10% of patients, conventional left ventricular lead placement is not possible for other technical reasons.

Left ventricular endocardial lead placement may overcome the limitations and allow placement to be guided by echocardiography, electrical mapping and the pattern of heart muscle scarring.

We aim to investigate if targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement improves exercise capacity, heart failure symptoms, heart function and size, heart pumping efficiency and biochemical markers of heart strain. Each parameter will be assessed independently and as part of a composite cardiac performance score.

Patients with heart failure will be enrolled who require an endocardial left ventricular lead on clinical grounds as either conventional left ventricular lead implantation has technically failed or they have clinically non-responded to CRT.

Enrollment

32 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than 18 years
  • NYHA class II-IV
  • LVEF ≤35%
  • QRS ≥120 milliseconds
  • Optimal tolerated medical therapy
  • Either unable to position an LV lead via the standard coronary sinus on CRT implantation
  • OR Recipient of a CRT-P or CRT-D system for greater than 6 months for standard indications AND limited improvement or worsened clinical status despite device optimisation
  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Life-expectancy less than 1 year due to concomitant, non-cardiovascular disorders
  • Previous atrial septal defect device closure.
  • Chronic renal dialysis and End stage liver disease
  • History of stroke, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, Coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary stenting within the last 3 months
  • Presence of correctable valvular disease (aortic/mitral)
  • Mitral valve prosthesis.
  • Contra indication to vitamin K antagonist
  • Unresolved intra-cardiac thrombus
  • Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

32 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Active Bi-ventricular Pacing
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement
No Biventricular pacing
Placebo Comparator group
Treatment:
Device: Targeted left ventricular endocardial lead placement

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Charles Butcher, MBBS MRCP

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems