Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)

Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC)

Status: Completed

Conditions: Emergencies; Acute Pain

Treatments: Other: RISK-INDEX

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05497830

NL78478.068.21

METC 21-068 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Rationale

Identifying emergency department (ED) patients at high and low risk shortly after admission could help decision-making regarding patient care. Several clinical risk scores and triage systems for stratification of patients have been developed, but often underperform in clinical practice. Moreover, most of these risk scores only have been diagnostically validated in an observational cohort, but never have been evaluated for their actual clinical impact. In a recent retrospective study that was conducted in the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), a novel clinical risk score, the RISKINDEX, was introduced that predicted 31-day mortality of sepsis patients presenting to an ED. The RISKINDEX hereby also outperformed internal medicine specialists. Observational follow-up studies underlined the potential of the risk score. However, it remains unknown to what extent these models have any beneficial value when it is actually implemented in clinical practice.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of the RISKINDEX as basis to conduct a large scale, multi-center randomised trial.

Study design

The MARS-ED study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial.

Study population

Adult patients who are assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist in the ED of whom a minimum of 4 different laboratory results (hematology or clinical chemistry, required for calculation of ML risk score) are available within the first two hours of the ED visit.

Intervention

Physicians will be presented with the ML risk score (the RISKINDEX) of the patients they are actively treating, directly after assessment of regular diagnostics has taken place.

Main study parameters

Primary

• Diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of a novel clinical risk score (the RISKINDEX)

Secondary

• Policy changes due to presentation of ML score (treatment policy, requesting ancillary investigations, treatment restrictions (i.e., no intubation or resuscitation)
• Intensive care (ICU) and medium care (MC) admission
• Length of admission
• Mortality within 31 days
• Readmission
• Patient preference
• Feasibility of novel clinical risk score

Full description

See our protocol paper, PMID 38263188

Enrollment: 1,300 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adult, defined as ≥ 18 years of age
• Assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist (gastroenterologists included) in the ED
• Willing to give written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).

Exclusion criteria

• <4 different laboratory results available (hematology or clinical chemistry) within the first two hours of the ED visit (calculation ML prediction score otherwise not possible)
• Unwilling to provide written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).

Trial design

Primary purpose: Diagnostic

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

1,300 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard care

No Intervention group

Description:

Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored.

RISKINDEX

Experimental group

Description:

Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored. In the intervention group, physicians will be presented with the RISKINDEX. Subsequently, self-report will again be initiated to evaluate the physicians' response to the ML score and possible policy changes due to the intervention.

Treatment:

Other: RISK-INDEX