Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In this study, we compared perioperative bleeding prediction scores with our machine learning-based prediction system in predicting the need for erythrocyte suspension during cardiovascular surgery.
Full description
The success of ML algorithms in predicting perioperative blood product use in CABG remains an under-tested topic. Unnecessary preparation of blood products or not being able to supply them when necessary is critical for both patient safety and the effective use of hospital resources [8]. Bleeding amounts and blood product use strategies can vary with institute protocols. Scoring systems that determine the general framework may not perform well due to local factors. ML algorithms can be created locally according to previous patient data of each clinic and can improve themselves with learning mechanisms, suggesting significant potential in this field.
In the current study, a new estimation system created with the ML algorithm was compared with the known estimation systems. Comparing the ML algorithm with 6 different classical scoring systems is important in terms of demonstrating the potential of this technology.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the model created with ML in predicting perioperative blood product consumption in cardiovascular surgeries is superior to predictive scoring systems that have proven themselves in the literature. Secondary aim is to compare the predictive value of using more than one scoring system in combination.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
430 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal