Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
In this comparative prospective study, we aim to compare the classic Macintosh laryngoscope and the Mac Grath videolaryncoscope in ICU covid 19 patients recruiting intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.
patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized in 2 groups: MacGrath and Macintosh.
we collected anthropometric and intubation data among all patients, and the 2 groups were compared regarding the time for intubation, the need of alternative techniques to intubate and the impact on the oxygenation by recording the lowest SPO2.
Full description
In this comparative prospective study, we aim to compare the classic Macintosh laryngoscope and the Mac Grath videolaryncoscope in ICU covid 19 patients recruiting intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.
All hypoxemic COVID19 patients requiring intubation were enrolled in this trial.
all patients had a preoxygenation with non invasive ventilation with 100% oxygen.
patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized in 2 groups: MacGrath and Macintosh.
we collected anthropometric and intubation data among all patients, and the 2 groups were compared regarding the time for intubation, the need of alternative techniques to intubate and the impact on the oxygenation by recording the lowest SPO2.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
80 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mhamed Mebazaa, Professor; Asma Ben Souissi, asso prof
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal