Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
An upper digestive endoscopy diagnostic procedure is undoubtedly a situation that will generate anxiety. The environment, protocols, distance the patient from the family member or partner, which is perceived as a threat to integrity. The objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a structured, significant follow-up nursing intervention to reduce anxiety in patients who are going to undergo upper digestive endoscopy in a public hospital in the Biobío Region, year 2021. The methodological proposal will be in a randomized, single-blind, third-party evaluation clinical trial, the intervention will consist of the visual and tactile presence of a significant companion throughout the endoscopic procedure. The sample will be 126 that will make up the experimental and control group. It is hypothesized that patients who have a significant follow-up will obtain 10 points less on the anxiety scale compared to those who did not have the intervention. The data will be collected with the Spielberg state / anxiety test (STAIT) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure psychological effects, with vital parameters (pressure, pulse, respiration, saturometry), physiological effects, as well as the effects biochemicals with blood levels of potassium, glycemia and cortisol in saliva and mechanical effects through the monitoring of movements, using a mesh of pressure sensors. The difference-in-difference statistical method will be applied by t student, to analyze the data. The requirements of Emmanuel will be applied to safeguard the ethics of the study. It is hoped that significant follow-up as a nursing intervention will be shown to reduce the anxiety of the patient who is going to undergo an endoscopic procedure.
Full description
The study is a clinical trial, with random assignment to two groups: control and experimental, that is, the study corresponds to a Design with Pretest-Postest and Control Group. The sample will be made up of all the patients who will undergo an endoscopy procedure in a public hospital, during the first quarter of the year 2021 and the intervention will be the significant accompaniment that the patient who is going to undergo an endoscopic procedure of the group will have experimental (EG) in the pre-procedure stage - during the procedure and after the procedure, while the control group (CG) will receive the usual care of the service under study, that is, without a significant companion.
DESCRIPTION OF THE STAGES OF THE INTERVENTION
PRE PROCEDURE PERIOD
Mediate: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic contingency, it is necessary to adopt the necessary security measures before, during and after conducting the interview with the patient who is going to undergo an endoscopic procedure. In this context, in the mediate preoperative period, to inform the patient that he is going to undergo an endoscopic procedure, non-face-to-face interviews will be promoted, through the use of electronic means, through videoconferencing, recorded telephone calls or emails, if the patient so requires, as well as conducting face-to-face interviews according to the protocols provided for it. The selected patients will be contacted by the coordinating nurse 3 or 4 days in advance, informing them that they must approach the emergency service to take PCR test (to detect COVID-19, this telephone contact will be the one that the responsible researcher will use to propose the voluntary participation in the study. If approved, the nursing professional responsible for the study will request the signing of the informed consent on the day the patient and companion attend to take the PCR test.
PROTOCOL SIGNATURE INFORMED CONSENT NOT PRESENTIAL
To carry out this procedure, the following protocol will be followed with each of the patients and significant companions that will make up the study sample:
PROTOCOL SIGNATURE INFORMED CONSENT IN PERSON To carry out this procedure, the following protocol will be followed with each of the patients and significant companions that will make up the study sample.
The interview will be carried out in an individual and well ventilated room.
The following should be considered in the interview:
Patient identification by name
Identification of the responsible researcher
Presentation of the research project
Request to approve recording of informed consent and / or sociodemographic data
Reading informed consent and request for sociodemographic data (Annex 4)
Request for clarification of doubts
End of interview and acknowledgments
Hand hygiene with soap and water and / or alcohol gel solution after the interview
INTERVIEW ROOM CLEANING AND DISINFECTION PROCEDURE Before carrying out the disinfection of the interview room, a surface cleaning process must be carried out, by removing organic and inorganic matter, usually by friction, with the help of detergents used in the establishment under study, subsequently rinsing with water to eliminate dirt by dragging.
Once the cleaning process has been carried out, the already clean surfaces must be disinfected, with the application of disinfectant products used by the service under study through the use of sprinklers, towels, fiber or microfiber cloths or mops.
Inmediate: the day of the endoscopic procedure, the significant person will be received by the clinical nurse, who will be in charge of:
INTERVENTION IN CONTROL GROUP WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING STAGES:
I.- Preprocedure Period
II.- Intraprocedure period After sedation, authorization will be requested from the responsible endoscopy medical professional to apply the Anxiety Assessment Scale (VAS), before which the investigated patient is asked to indicate the intensity of the sensation by placing a line through of the scale, which represents the intensity of anxiety at that moment.
III.- Postprocedure Period Once the patient has recovered from sedation, the evaluator will measure the psychological -physiological-biochemical parameters.
In this last stage, a variable that measures mechanical parameters will be incorporated, that is, the respiratory and body movements that the post-sedation patient has.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION The statistical program Epidat 3.1 was used to calculate the sample size of the study. To carry out this procedure, the estimates from other studies were used, with a standard deviation of 10.4 for the STAY scale, with a difference of 5 points as clinically relevant. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (5%), a ratio between the means of 1, with a power of 80%. After entering the data into the software, the finally suggested sample is 126 patients, a number that is weighted to admit 10% of dropouts or withdrawals from the study, completing a sample size to be selected of 139 patients. From the definitive sample size (n = 126), the experimental group (n = 63) and the control group (n= 63) were finally formed.
DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS The data obtained will be analyzed through the SPSS statistical program. For the analysis of the data obtained, a statistical evaluation will be carried out by objectives, which will include, firstly, descriptive analysis through frequency tables and graphs, and secondly, obtaining statistics such as mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, maximum and minimum.
INFERENTIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE TEST OF HYPOTHESIS. For the development of this experimental study (intervention in a treatment group and counterfactual in a control group), the difference-in-difference method will be used, by means of the T-Student test. In this case, the comparisons are of three types.
First, the means of the control and experimental groups are compared in the baseline period, where it is expected that there are no significant differences. With this evaluation it is hoped to prove that both groups are homogeneous prior to the intervention.
Secondly, within each group, the means obtained in different periods (Preprocedure, Intraprocedure and Postprocedure) are compared, expecting that the control and experimental groups present a different behavior, in particular, that the eventual increases in the anxiety-related variables are lower in the experimental group compared to the control group.
Third, the means for the Preprocedure-Intraprocedure and Postprocedure periods are compared between the control and experimental groups, where better results are expected in the experimental group.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
126 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal