Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Postoperative respiratory failure (PORF) remains a critical driver of morbidity, mortality, and incremental care costs in surgical populations. Traditional escalation often involves invasive mechanical ventilation, which is associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and increased resource burden.
Full description
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) have both been shown to improve oxygen levels effectively and reduce the need for reintubation in various patient groups. However, head-to-head data in patients with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary function (PORF) are scarce.
This protocol employs a robust and scalable design to generate high-quality evidence, empower perioperative stakeholders, and optimize patient-centric respiratory strategies. We hypothesize that NIV will reduce 72-hour reintubation rates compared to HFNC, translating into shorter ICU stays and lower costs.
Methodology & Operational Workflow
ABGs and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) at 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours. Comfort scores every six hours. Record interface-related adverse events.
Hemodynamic instability occurs due to the use of new-onset vasopressors. Deterioration leading to invasive ventilation → classified as "reintubation."
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
180 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ahmad M. Shaddad, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal