ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Manual Therapy Versus Conventional Rehabilitation Protocol on Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Ç

Çukurova University

Status

Completed

Conditions

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Treatments

Other: accelerated protocol and mulligan method

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study compares the periodic effects of Accelerated rehabilitation protocol (ARP) and Mulligan mobilization with mowement method (MWM) in subacromial pain syndrome patients rehabilitation. Half of the participants will receive ARP, while the other half will receive MWM.

Enrollment

42 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 60 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • to be in the 18-60 age range, to be cooperative during evaluation and treatment and to accept to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • the presence of adhesive capsulitis, surgical indication or shoulder surgery, cervicothoracic problems (such as stenosis and disc herniation) diagnosed as neurological or inflammatory joint diseases

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

42 participants in 2 patient groups

mulligan method
Experimental group
Description:
Mulligan mobilization with mowement method every three days for six weeks
Treatment:
Other: accelerated protocol and mulligan method
accelerated protocol
Experimental group
Description:
accelerated rehabilitation protocol every three days for six weeks
Treatment:
Other: accelerated protocol and mulligan method

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems