Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by problems in emotion regulation, identity disturbances, and impaired interpersonal functioning. Because BPD may determine health and quality of life in long term, it is important to focus on early detection and early intervention to prevent worsening. In this study, the effectiveness of a new intervention, MBT-early, is investigated in adolescents with borderline personality problems, using a single-case experimental design (SCED).
V1.0 Initial release - [13/12/2023]: Initial registration.
V1.1 2 Amendments - [14-07-2025]:
Full description
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by problems in emotion regulation, identity disturbances, and impaired interpersonal functioning. Because BPD may determine health and quality of life in long term, it is important to focus on early detection and early intervention to prevent worsening. In this study, the effectiveness of a new intervention, MBT-early, is investigated in adolescents with borderline personality problems through a single case experimental design (SCED). Existing studies into the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for young people with a (subclinical) borderline personality disorder (BPD) show mixed results. An obvious explanation therefore lies in the heterogeneity of the samples studied, where the same intervention is investigated by young people with some characteristics of borderline personality problems in an early stage as by young people with significant borderline personality problems at a later stage. However, there is evidence that interventions should be targeted specifically at the stage of progression of the disorder ('staged care'). Interventions may be more effective when they correspond to the stage of disease progression. MBT-early is an intervention intended for young people in an early stage of BPD. The intervention not only addresses the characteristics of BPD, but generally aims to improve personality functioning. MBT-early focuses on strengthening the young person's mentalizing capacity and to increase epistemic trust (the openness to learn from others) in order to prevent developmental stagnation and chronic consequences of personality disfunctioning. Although there is evidence for the efficacy of MBT for adults and adolescents, MBT-early has not yet been studied in terms of effectiveness. This study sets out to investigate the effectiveness of MBT-early, using a Single Case Experimental Design. The investigators hypothesize that treating youngsters with early features of BPD with MBT-early results in reduction of features of personality problems and the most frequently occurring symptoms (depressive symptoms). Exploratively mechanisms of change are being explored.
Research questions:
Objective of the study: The primary objective is to study the effectiveness of MBT-early in terms of treatment outcome on personality functioning and depressive symptoms. As a second objective the investigators will exploratively study the presumed working mechanisms of the MBT-early intervention (mentalizing capacities and epistemic trust).
Amendment 1 (Approved October 22, 2024):
Diagnostic information obtained during intake, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Syndrome Disorders (SCID-5-S), is used to verify inclusion criteria. Although this was part of the original protocol, it has now been explicitly clarified in the participant information material. Additionally, therapist-maintained logbooks documenting deviations from standard treatment protocols (e.g., missed sessions or clinical incidents) have been introduced to enhance contextual interpretation of the SCED data.
Amendment 2 (Approved January 23, 2025):
To increase the representativeness of the sample, the maximum number of participants has been increased from 6 to 8. Furthermore, a qualitative component was added to the design. After completing treatment, participants, their caregivers, and their therapists will be invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to explore perceived treatment processes and outcomes. These interviews aim to enrich interpretation of quantitative findings and explore perspectives on symptom change, treatment satisfaction, and contextual factors.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
8 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sharon L. Clarke, MSc
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal