McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit (MACMAN)

Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee

Status: Completed

Conditions: Intratracheal Intubation in Critical Care

Treatments: Device: Videolaryngoscope; Device: Standard laryngoscope

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02413723

2014-A00674-43

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the rate of successful orotracheal intubation at first laryngoscopy will be higher in patients intubated with McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope compared to patients intubated with classical Macintosh laryngoscope in patients requiring an orotracheal intubation in ICU.

Enrollment: 371 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

• Contraindication to orotracheal intubation
• Time too short to allow inclusion and randomisation of patient (particularly cardiac arrest)
• Minor (<18 )
• Pregnant, parturient , or breast-feeding woman
• Patient hospitalized without consent and/or deprived of liberty by court's decision
• Patient under guardianship or curators
• Lack of social insurance
• Lack of informed consent
• Concomitant inclusion in a trial whose primary endpoint focuses on intubation procedure

Trial design

Primary purpose: Supportive Care

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

371 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Videolaryngoscope McGrath Mac

Active Comparator group

Description:

McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope will be used for laryngoscopy for patient's intubation

Treatment:

Device: Videolaryngoscope

Standard laryngoscope

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

Macintosh laryngoscope will be used for laryngoscopy for patient's intubation

Treatment:

Device: Standard laryngoscope