McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope (MGM-Eval)

Hopital Foch

Status: Terminated

Conditions: Tracheal Intubation

Treatments: Device: McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope; Device: Macintosh laryngoscope

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02292901

2013-A01307-38 (Other Identifier)

2013/42

Details and patient eligibility

About

Videolaryngoscopes become widely used. The aim of this study is to compare McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope to conventional MacIntosh laryngoscope in patients without known risk of difficult of mask ventilation and of tracheal intubation.

Enrollment: 158 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 80 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• patient scheduled for a general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

• predictable risk of difficult mask ventilation or of difficult tracheal intubation
• necessity of a rapid sequence induction
• contra-indication to sufentanil, to propofol, or to atracurium
• ENT, thoracic surgery, or intracranial surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

158 participants in 2 patient groups

Macintosh laryngoscope

Active Comparator group

Description:

Tracheal intubation will be performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope

Treatment:

Device: Macintosh laryngoscope

McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope

Experimental group

Description:

Tracheal intubation will be performed using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope

Treatment:

Device: McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope