Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Manual In-line Stabilization

Hallym University

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Anesthesia, General

Treatments: Device: Group ML; Device: Group DL

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03516539

2017-I043

Details and patient eligibility

About

Video laryngoscopy provides easily a good laryngeal view compared to direct laryngoscopy. It is particularly, useful in patients with anticipated difficult intubation, and also widely used for educational purposes. Among video laryngoscopy, Mcgrath is a recently-developed, portable video laryngoscopy with a liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and disposable curved blade.

Mcgrath is known to provide excellent laryngeal visibility even in case of anticipated-difficult and anticipated-unsuccessful intubation as well as normal airway management. However, compared with direct laryngoscopy, the success rate of intubation and the time required for anticipated difficult intubation have been reported conflicting results in previous studies. The aim of this study was to compare the intubation success rate, the intubation time and the ease of use with Mcgrath video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy during intubation.

Full description

1. In the operating room, all patients are monitored with an electrocardiograph, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximeter, capnograph and Bispectral index (BIS) monitor. After pre-oxygenation with 100% oxygen for 1 minute, intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanyl is administrated and followed by rocuronium (0.6mg/kg). When patients are lost their consciousness, manual mask ventilation is proceeded with 100% oxygen for 2 minutes.
2. Transoral endotracheal intubation is performed using Mcgrath videolaryngoscope (Group ML) and direct laryngoscope (Group DL) using manual in-line stabilization. At this time, the time required for intubation is measure by other medical personnel not engaged in this research.
3. The anesthesiologist assesses Cormack Lehane laryngeal visual field,external laryngeal manipulation, intubation difficulty scales (IDS) and the difficulty of intubation.

Enrollment: 100 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 19 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients scheduled for general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients are aged 19 to 70 years and are American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients requiring rapid sequence intubation Patients with poor teeth or high risk of aspiration pneumonia Cervical spine pathology, pharyngeal pathology

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

100 participants in 2 patient groups

Group ML

Experimental group

Description:

Mcgrath videolaryngoscopy

Treatment:

Device: Group ML

Group DL

Active Comparator group

Description:

direct Macintosh laryngoscope

Treatment:

Device: Group DL