Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Randomized clinical trial to compare between biting force of mandibular complete denture constructed from two different materials; metal reinforced polyamide and conventional PMMA,The null hypothesis of the study that there will not be a difference between biting force of the complete denture constructed from metal reinforced polyamide and PMMA
Full description
Polyamide resins used in dentistry exhibit high flexibility, physical strength, heat and chemical resistance and the exceedingly rare allergy response. Although flexural strength, modulus of elasticity and rigidity of nylon (polyamide) denture base materials are relatively low, they demonstrate great impact strength, toughness, and resistance to fracture. It was suggested that by adding glass fibers to polyamides, their stiffness and other mechanical properties could be increased. The flexural properties of nylon denture base materials has promoted their usage only in conditions like unyielding undercuts, pronounced tuberosities, tori and bulging alveolar ridges. In 2013 Wadachi etal compared rigidity of polyamide and PMMA when used as a denture base material and concluded that; the modulus of elasticity of polyamide was very low in comparison to PMMA and was lower than ISO standard, and so they recommended that polyamide to be used as a denture base material it should be reinforced with metal frame
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
24 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
nadia abbas; Hadeer Abdel hadi Abd elhameed, master
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal