Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

A

Ankara City Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest
Resuscitation

Treatments

Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
Other: Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04422938
medybu-IN

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Full description

In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.

Enrollment

303 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department

Exclusion criteria

<18 age

Trial design

303 participants in 2 patient groups

Manuel compression
Description:
Manuel chest compressions will be handled by clinicians
Treatment:
Other: Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians
Mechanical compression
Description:
Mechanical chest compressions will be handled via mechanical chest compression device
Treatment:
Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems