ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression

A

Ankara City Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrest

Treatments

Other: Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04069377
medybu154

Details and patient eligibility

About

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Full description

In this study, the investigators retrospectively analyzed resuscitations performed over a 2-year period and compared manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge parameters.

Enrollment

214 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases Out-of-hospital arrest

Exclusion criteria

<18 age

Trial design

214 participants in 2 patient groups

Manuel chest compression
Description:
Manuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts.
Treatment:
Other: Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
Mechanical chest compression
Description:
In the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2).
Treatment:
Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems