ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Mechanisms of Response to Therapeutic Intervention in Clinical High Risk (CHR) for Psychosis

Beth Israel Lahey Health logo

Beth Israel Lahey Health

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Psychosis; Schizophrenia-Like
Healthy Controls

Treatments

Device: Mb-rt-fMRI-NFB
Device: Sham rTMS
Device: Sham mb-rt-fMRI-NFB
Device: rTMS

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Other U.S. Federal agency
NIH

Identifiers

NCT06542640
2R01MH111448 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
2023P001089

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study, "Psychobiological Follow-up Study of Transition from Prodrome to Early Psychosis", will be conducted in collaboration with the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC) and several data processing sites in the United States. The current study builds on findings from the investigator's previous work that identified several biomarkers in participants at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis that may be related to clinical outcomes such as the development of psychosis. This study responds to the critical need to understand links between biomarkers (could be clinical, cognitive, biological or other abnormalities) and later clinical outcomes.

Participants will receive either one of two real interventions or one of two sham (a procedure that looks like the real treatment but is not) interventions, involving either: 1. repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)1; or 2. mindfulness-based real time fMRI neurofeedback (mb-rt-fMRI-NFB). Both procedures will measure brain capacity for change in CHR individuals, thus paving the way forward for future therapeutic interventions.

The main hypotheses to be addressed by this study are:

    • Following real interventions, novel biomarkers will be more effective predictors of clinical outcome than standard biomarkers in participants at CHR for psychosis
    • Following real interventions, novel biomarkers will be more effective predictors of clinical outcomes in participants who received the real intervention than in participants who received sham treatments
    • The novel interventions will reduce biomarker abnormalities in individuals with CHR relative to their own baselines and relative to healthy controls (HC)
    • The sham interventions will will not reduce biomarker abnormalities in individuals with CHR relative to their own baselines or relative to HC

Full description

This study builds upon our previous work, entitled "Psychobiological Follow-up Study of Transition from Prodrome to Early Psychosis" (R01MH111448). This study, titled Mechanisms of Response to Therapeutic Intervention in Clinical High Risk (CHR) for Psychosis: A bridge to treatment", focuses on two persistent needs in clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis research: 1) the identification of novel biomarkers associated with transition to psychosis and other clinical outcomes; and 2) the identification of symptom-specific brain circuit targets that can be engaged in future clinical trials. The investigators hypothesize that clinically relevant biomarkers for participant-specific prognosis in CHR will be enhanced by the inclusion of biomarker measures that allow for the quantitative assessment of neural plasticity and are likely amenable to therapeutic change. In this view, CHR clinical outcomes are likely determined by both pathophysiology and by the brain's capacity to adapt and respond to pathophysiology via neural plasticity mechanisms. The investigators thus propose to examine brain circuit plasticity biomarkers relevant to CHR by administering non-invasive neuromodulation via two novel paradigms that, as they demonstrated previously in schizophrenia, engage brain networks involved in negative and positive psychiatric symptoms. These two novel interventional techniques are: 1. repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); and 2. mindfulness-based real time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback enhanced mindful meditation (mb-rt-fMRI-NFB) The investigators will also collect both traditional biomarkers (for example, clinical, neuropsychological, electrophysiological and neuroimaging biomarkers) and the novel biomarkers listed above (i.e., biomarkers that quantify neural changes pre- relative to post-intervention). These two interventions, which have not been used with CHR subjects before, will be tested in 200 CHR (50 CHR per experimental condition) and 100 HC over 5 years. Furthermore, the investigators will continue to enhance knowledge capacity at the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC), where their Chinese collaborators are based. They will also examine the effectiveness of these interventions in CHR as a bridge to future therapeutic treatments and will test traditional and novel biomarkers as predictors of clinical and neurocognitive outcomes. Additionally, the investigators will significantly enhance research capacity by building on already established achievements and collaborations, and by extending their reach to new institutions (Aim 4). This competitive renewal capitalizes on a unique set of strengths at a single site (SMHC) and on a collaboration with the Shanghai research team, which has proven to be most productive in the current grant cycle. The investigators hypothesize that this highly novel study will contribute to the development of future therapeutic interventions in CHR, which will prevent this vulnerable population from developing adverse outcomes and, at the same time, will enrich the CHR field with new insights into the pathophysiology of this condition.

Enrollment

300 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

15 to 35 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Clinical High Risk (CHR):

  1. Male or female between 15 and 35 years old.

  2. Can understand and sign an informed consent (or assent for minors) document.

  3. Must meet the substance use criteria:

    1. No Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Alcohol or Drug Dependence in the past 3 months;
    2. No use on the day of assessment, clearly not intoxicated or hung-over.
  4. Must meet diagnostic criteria for a prodromal syndrome. If under the age of 19 and meet diagnostic criteria for Schizotypal Personality Disorder or meet the diagnostic criteria called the Criteria for Prodromal Syndromes (COPS), which are operationalized as follows (a-c below):

    1. Genetic Risk and Deterioration Syndrome (GRDS): First degree biological relative with psychosis or subject with Schizotypal Personality Disorder and a 30% drop in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score compared to one year ago, sustained over the past month.
    2. Attenuated Positive Symptoms Syndrome (APSS): Severity rating of moderate (rating of 3), moderately severe (4) or severe but not psychotic (5) on any one of the five Symptoms of Psychotic Disorders (SOPS) positive symptoms; symptom occurs at or above moderate severity level at an average frequency of at least once per week in the past month; symptom must have begun in the past year or currently rates at least one scale point higher than rated 12 months previously.
    3. Brief Intermittent Psychotic Syndrome (BIPS): Severity rating of psychotic intensity (6) on any of the 5 SOPS positive symptoms; symptom is present at least several minutes per day at a frequency of at least once per month; symptom(s) must have reached a psychotic intensity in the past 3 months; symptom is not seriously disorganizing or dangerous; symptom(s) do not last for more than 1 hour/day at an average frequency of 4 days/week over 1 month.
  5. . Participant may be remitted from the CHR syndrome or may have converted to a full psychotic disorder since study entry and either is acceptable - they remain eligible to participate in follow-up procedures.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Meet criteria for current or lifetime Axis I psychotic disorder, including affective psychoses and psychosis Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) at the baseline assessment
  2. Impaired intellectual functioning (i.e., Intelligence Quotient (IQ)<70) at baseline.
  3. Past history of or current clinically significant central nervous system disorder that may contribute to prodromal symptoms or confound their assessment.
  4. Traumatic Brain Injury that is rated as 7 or above on the Traumatic Brain Injury screening instrument (signifying a significant brain injury with persistent sequelae) or current concussion that interferes with any assessment measures.
  5. Diagnostic prodromal symptoms that are clearly caused by one or more other psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorders, in the judgment of the evaluating clinician. Other non-psychotic Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5) disorders will not be exclusionary (e.g., substance abuse disorder, major depression, anxiety disorders, personality disorders), as long as the disorder does not account for the diagnosis of prodromal symptoms.

Healthy Controls (HC):

  1. Must meet subject inclusion criteria 1-2 and exclusion criteria 1-5. Must not meet criteria for any prodromal syndrome, any current or past psychotic disorder or Cluster A personality disorder diagnosis and must not be receiving any current treatment with psychotropic medication at the baseline assessment.
  2. Must not have a family history (in first-degree relatives) of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, or any other disorder involving psychotic symptoms.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

300 participants in 5 patient groups

CHR with mb-rt-fMRI-NFB Group
Experimental group
Description:
This CHR group will receive experimental treatment via mb-rt-fMRI-NFB, in a targeted frontal lobe region including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
Treatment:
Device: Mb-rt-fMRI-NFB
CHR with sham mb-rt-fMRI-NFB Group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
This CHR group will receive treatment via mb-rt-fMRI-NFB, but in a different, uninvolved brain region
Treatment:
Device: Sham mb-rt-fMRI-NFB
CHR with rTMS Group
Experimental group
Description:
This CHR group will receive experimental treatment via rTMS, along a targeted neural pathway extending from the cerebellum to the midbrain to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)
Treatment:
Device: rTMS
CHR with sham rTMS Group
Sham Comparator group
Description:
This CHR group will receive treatment via rTMS, but in a different, uninvolved brain region
Treatment:
Device: Sham rTMS
Healthy Control Group
No Intervention group
Description:
The healthy control group will not receive any treatment, but will be used as a comparison for the 2 experimental and 2 sham groups.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

William S Stone, Ph.D.; Margaret A Niznikiewicz, Ph.D.

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems