ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Medial Rectus Fenestration vs Recession for PAET

M

Mansoura University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Partially Accommodative Esotropia

Treatments

Procedure: medial rectus fenestration
Procedure: medial rectus recession

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06298929
36264PR427/11/23

Details and patient eligibility

About

This prospective comparative study aims to compare medial rectus (MR) muscle fenestration and recession in patients with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The main question it aims to answer is whether MR fenestration is equally effective as MR recession for PAET.

All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment. Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups; Group 1 will receive conventional MR recession, and Group 2 will receive MR fenestration.

Full description

Inclusion criteria The study will include patients with accommodative esotropia if the residual distance deviation with full cycloplegic correction is > 15PD.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with convergence excess esotropia, defined as a near deviation with glasses exceeding that for distance by 15 PD or more.
  2. Patients with paralytic or restrictive strabismus.
  3. Patients with previous strabismus surgery
  4. Patients with neurologic, ocular, or developmental disorders or follow-up less than 6 months

All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment including:

i) A full ophthalmological assessment including history taking, measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination, as well as a dilated fundus examination.

ii) Measurement of the deviation at distance (6 m) and near (33 cm). iii) Assessment of ductions and versions in all cardinal directions of gaze

Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups:

  1. Group 1: Unilateral or bilateral conventional MR recession. Augmented formula will be used to decide the Surgical dosage using the standard tables (3)
  2. Group 2: unilateral or bilateral MR fenestration All surgeries will be performed by one experienced surgeon (H.SH)

Enrollment

60 estimated patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with accommodative esotropia if the residual distance deviation with full cycloplegic correction is > 15PD.

Exclusion criteria

  1. convergence excess esotropia.
  2. paralytic or restrictive strabismus.
  3. previous strabismus surgery
  4. neurologic, ocular, or developmental disorders or follow-up less than 6 months

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

60 participants in 2 patient groups

Group 1
Active Comparator group
Description:
patients with PAET who will receive unilateral or bilateral MR fenestration
Treatment:
Procedure: medial rectus fenestration
Group 2
Active Comparator group
Description:
patients with PAET who will receive unilateral or bilateral MR recession
Treatment:
Procedure: medial rectus recession

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ameera G Abdelhameed, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems