Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This prospective comparative study aims to compare medial rectus (MR) muscle fenestration and recession in patients with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The main question it aims to answer is whether MR fenestration is equally effective as MR recession for PAET.
All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment. Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups; Group 1 will receive conventional MR recession, and Group 2 will receive MR fenestration.
Full description
Inclusion criteria The study will include patients with accommodative esotropia if the residual distance deviation with full cycloplegic correction is > 15PD.
Exclusion criteria:
All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment including:
i) A full ophthalmological assessment including history taking, measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination, as well as a dilated fundus examination.
ii) Measurement of the deviation at distance (6 m) and near (33 cm). iii) Assessment of ductions and versions in all cardinal directions of gaze
Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups:
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ameera G Abdelhameed, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal