Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this study is to compare 2 surgical treatments of severe fecal incontinence (defined as more than a major leak per week). The hypothesis of this "non-inferiority" trial is that magnetic anal sphincter is clinically as effective as SNS, but more cost-effective in managing fecal incontinence
Full description
Severe anal incontinence, defined as the uncontrolled passing of stool at least once a week, is a problem that has a serious impact on the quality of life. In the event of failure of conservative treatments, surgery can help improve continence problems in a significant number of cases.
Sacral nerve stimulation is currently the standard surgical treatment for severe anal incontinence when sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty) is not recommended.
A new method of treatment based on sphincter reinforcement through the implanting of a band of magnetic beads*, has proved to be reliable and efficient on a small series of cases, particularly after the failure of sacral nerve stimulation.
The aim of our trial, which compares the "magnetic anal sphincter* and sacral nerve stimulation" in a homogeneous population of patients affected by severe anal incontinence is to define the position of this new approach in the treatment algorithm of this functional disorder, determining its clinical and medical/economic advantages compared to those of the current standard treatment.
* FenixTM (Torax Medical)
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Adult patient (male or female) of 18 to 75 years of age
Affected by severe anal incontinence (SAI)*.
Documented failure of conservative treatment (reeducation and medical treatment)
With functional anal sphincter**
Agrees to take part in the study and has signed the informed consent form
Agrees to undergo post-operative surveillance for a period of one (1) year
Covered by National Insurance
Internal sphincter injuries not taken into account (by professional consensus).
Exclusion criteria
Anorectal or pelvic malformations
Local conditions incompatible with the proposed sizes of the MAS (extreme obesity, thickness of the tissue in the anorectal area)
Sequelae of rectal resections - presence of cancer of the rectum or anus
Rectal prolapse and/or major pelvic floor disorders
Major chronic disorder of the intestinal motility, irritable bowel syndrome, repeated faecalomas, megarectum
Extensive sphincter degeneration
Consequences of radiation-induced rectitis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel (Crohn's disease)
Neurological disorders or systemic diseases (multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, paraplegia)
Festering sores of the perineal and/or anorectal regions
Known or suspected risks of allergy to titanium
Active pelvic infection
Contraindications to SNS:
Pregnant women
Adults under guardianship
Patients involved in a mobility project in the year following the operation
Patient already subjected to one or other of the therapeutic approaches (MAS or SNS) Please note: coagulation problems (including anti-aggregant or anti-coagulant treatments) are not a contraindication if these problems can be corrected during the perioperative period.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
71 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal