Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Used as a premedication to decrease anxiety (Caumo et al., 2007). Midazolam, though has several drawbacks (McCann and Kain, 2001). Hence, an alternative premedication to midazolam will definitely have a widespread appeal.
Melatonin is a hormone secreted by the pineal gland. Melatonin is different from benzodiazepines and their derivatives in that it exerts a promoting effect on sleep by amplifying day/night differences in alertness and sleep quality and displaying a modest sleep-inducing effect, quite mild as compared to that seen with benzodiazepines (Ahmad et al., 2007). Melatonin has also been reported to cause preoperative anxiolysis and an increase in levels of sedation without impairing orientation (Naguib and Samarkandi, 2000). Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of oral melatonin and oral midazolam on preoperative anxiety.
Emergence delirium (ED) was first described in the literature in the early 1960s. Although often used interchangeably with emergence agitation, it is defined as a temporary dissociated state of consciousness after discontinuation of anesthesia. The characteristics that make up ED include irritability, inconsolable crying, distress and inability to cooperate (Reduque and Verghese, 2013).
Midazolam is the most prescribed oral premedication in the preoperative setting. Its benefits include preoperative anxiolysis, amnesia, relatively rapid onset and short duration of action. Although most children have anxiolysis with midazolam, up to 29% may display a paradoxical agitation response (Shin et al., 2013).
Oral melatonin doses up to 0.4 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg) are effective in reducing ED in children (age 3-7 years) (Kain et al., 2009).
AIM OF THE WORK The study aims to compare the effects of oral melatonin and oral midazolam on preoperative anxiety as a premedication in children undergoing tonsillectomy.
Full description
Preoperative anxiety is a common and significant concern in pediatric patients undergoing surgery. Anxiety is defined as a feeling of apprehension, fear, or uneasiness about an anticipated event, and in the surgical setting, it arises primarily from the fear of separation from parents, unfamiliar environments, painful stimuli, and the unknown nature of the procedure itself (Kain et al., 2006). Studies estimate that up to 60-70% of children experience substantial preoperative anxiety, with younger children, those with shy temperaments, and those undergoing repeated surgeries being at higher risk (Chow et al., 2016).
Causes and Contributing Factors Several factors contribute to heightened anxiety in children before surgery. These include developmental stage, previous hospitalizations, parental anxiety levels, lack of adequate preparation or information, and the presence of unfamiliar medical personnel (Fortier et al., 2010). Children aged between 1 and 5 years are especially vulnerable due to their limited coping mechanisms and fear of separation. A child's temperament, such as shyness or behavioral inhibition, also influences anxiety levels (Davidson et al., 2006).
Clinical Implications of Preoperative Anxiety Unmanaged preoperative anxiety has both immediate and long-term consequences. It can lead to increased distress during induction of anesthesia, higher requirements for anesthetic agents, postoperative pain, emergence delirium, and delayed recovery (Kain et al., 2004). Moreover, there is a correlation between preoperative anxiety and the development of postoperative maladaptive behaviors such as nightmares, bedwetting, aggression, and eating disturbances (Yuki and Daaboul, 2011) Assessment of Preoperative Anxiety Quantifying anxiety in children is essential for guiding intervention. Several validated tools are available, including the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS), which evaluates behaviors like activity level, vocalization, emotional expressivity, and use of parents. This scale is reliable in assessing anxiety levels during the preoperative period (Ramkisson, 2019).
Management Strategies Preoperative anxiety in children is a multifaceted problem that significantly affects surgical outcomes. Early identification and appropriate interventions, both behavioral and pharmacological, can reduce anxiety levels, improve compliance, and contribute to better perioperative experiences (Matthias and Samarasekera, 2012).
Management of preoperative anxiety in children includes both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Non-drug approaches include parental presence during induction, behavioral interventions (e.g., distraction, play therapy, video games), and preoperative education. Pharmacological agents such as midazolam and melatonin are also widely used for anxiolysis. A multimodal approach is often the most effective (Agbayani et al., 2020).
PREOPERATIVE SEDATION AND PREMEDICATION IN PEDIATRICS T The goal of preoperative sedation and premedication is to reduce anxiety, facilitate smooth induction of anesthesia, decrease psychological trauma, and improve the overall perioperative experience. Children are particularly vulnerable to preoperative stress, making the selection of safe and effective premedication essential (Dave, 2019).
Premedication in children has evolved significantly over the past decades. Initially, sedatives such as chloral hydrate and opioids were used, but concerns regarding safety and postoperative respiratory depression shifted focus toward benzodiazepines and other safer agents. In recent years, natural compounds like melatonin have emerged as alternatives to synthetic sedatives (Beckman et al., 2017).
Classification of Sedation Techniques
Sedation techniques can be classified as:
Pharmacological Includes benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam), alpha-2 agonists (e.g., clonidine, dexmedetomidine), antihistamines, and melatonin (Taghizadeh et al., 2015).
Non-pharmacological Includes parental presence, audiovisual distraction (e.g., cartoons), hypnosis, cognitive behavioral therapy, and music therapy (Kulakaç and Ustuner Top, 2025).
Routes of Administration
Premedication can be administered via various routes depending on the agent and patient preference:
Criteria for Ideal Premedication
An ideal premedication agent in pediatrics should:
Premedication reduces anxiety, minimizes crying during separation and induction, and can improve compliance. The choice of agent depends on child characteristics, surgery type, and institutional protocols. Oral midazolam remains the gold standard, but melatonin is increasingly favored for its natural origin and fewer adverse effects (Isik et al., 2008).
Preoperative sedation and premedication are crucial in pediatric anesthesia. A tailored approach using both pharmacologic and behavioral strategies ensures optimal outcomes. The emergence of agents like melatonin is promising, particularly in cases where minimizing side effects is a priority (Rana et al., 2024).
General Contraindications to Preoperative Sedation in Pediatrics While preoperative sedation is beneficial in reducing anxiety and facilitating smooth induction, it is not universally safe for all pediatric patients. Several clinical scenarios warrant caution or complete avoidance of sedative premedication due to the risk of adverse effects or worsening of the underlying condition (Yang et al., 2022).
Absolute Contraindications
These are conditions where sedation is clearly contraindicated:
Relative Contraindications
These require careful assessment and individualized risk-benefit analysis:
Caution in Certain Populations
MIDAZOLAM M idazolam is a water-soluble benzodiazepine derivative used widely in pediatric anesthesia for preoperative anxiolysis, sedation, and as an induction adjunct. It was first synthesized in 1976 and introduced clinically due to its rapid onset, short duration, and relative safety compared to diazepam. It functions primarily as a positive allosteric modulator at GABA-A receptors, enhancing the effect of endogenous GABA by increasing the frequency of chloride channel opening, resulting in hyperpolarization and decreased neuronal excitability (Khurmi et al., 2017).
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics Midazolam exhibits dose-dependent effects, ranging from anxiolysis at low doses to hypnosis and amnesia at higher doses (Hong, 2022). It is unique among benzodiazepines for its pH-dependent ring structure: in acidic solutions, it is water-soluble, but at physiological pH, it becomes lipophilic, facilitating rapid brain uptake. Its volume of distribution in children is larger than in adults, and its half-life ranges from 1.5 to 3 hours in healthy pediatric patients. In neonates and infants, the half-life may be prolonged due to immature liver enzyme systems (Coté and Wilson, 2008).
Midazolam undergoes hepatic metabolism via the CYP3A4 enzyme, producing an active metabolite, 1-hydroxymidazolam, which contributes to its sedative effects but is less potent. Renal excretion eliminates both the parent drug and its metabolites. Thus, caution is required in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction (Flores-Pérez et al., 2023).
Figure 1: Midazolam Metabolism and Mechanism of Action (Smith et al., 1981, Reves et al., 1985) Routes of Administration
Clinical Applications
Midazolam is used extensively in pediatric anesthesia:
It reduces separation anxiety during parental handover, improves mask acceptance, and provides anterograde amnesia, thus minimizing traumatic memory formation. It is often combined with ketamine or opioids to enhance sedation and analgesia (Coté and Wilson, 2008).
Safety and Side Effects
Though generally safe when used appropriately, midazolam is associated with several potential adverse effects:
Evidence-Based Effectiveness Studies have shown midazolam to be superior to placebo in reducing preoperative anxiety and improving induction quality. However, concerns about its cognitive effects, particularly amnesia and post-discharge behavior changes, have led researchers to explore alternative agents like melatonin (Samarkandi et al., 2005).
MELATONIN M elatonin is an indoleamine hormone synthesized from tryptophan in the pineal gland, especially in response to darkness. Beyond its role in regulating the circadian rhythm, melatonin has anxiolytic, hypnotic, analgesic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects that are increasingly utilized in pediatric anesthesia (Repova et al., 2022).
Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action Melatonin acts primarily on MT1 and MT2 G-protein coupled receptors, mainly located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, hippocampus, and other CNS sites. MT1 promotes sleep induction, while MT2 regulates circadian phase shifts. Melatonin also modulates GABAergic, opioid, and nitric oxide pathways, explaining its multi-modal sedative and analgesic effects (Kurdi and Patel, 2013).
Figure 2: Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action (Sharma et al., 2015). Unlike benzodiazepines, melatonin does not cause respiratory depression, cognitive impairment, or addiction. Its elimination half-life is 30-60 minutes, but receptor interaction effects may last longer. It is metabolized in the liver by CYP1A2 and excreted as 6-sulfatoxymelatonin in urine (Beshir and Cook, 2021).
Pediatric Dosage and Administration
There is no universally agreed-upon pediatric dose, but commonly used regimens include:
Melatonin is typically given 30-60 minutes before surgery, allowing sufficient time for peak serum levels (Naguib et al., 2007).
Clinical Applications in Pediatric Anesthesia
Melatonin provides effective premedication by:
Analgesic and Neuroprotective Effect Melatonin exerts antinociceptive effects by interacting with opioid receptors, calcium channels, and antioxidant pathways. It reduces the need for postoperative opioids and supports faster recovery. In neonates and preterm infants, melatonin shows neuroprotective potential in hypoxic-ischemic injury due to its antioxidant action (Gitto et al., 2016).
Safety Profile
Melatonin is remarkably well-tolerated:
Table 2: Comparison between midazolam and melatonin (Peter et al., 2024) (Tordjman et al., 2017)
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
-ALL children with ASA class I and class II
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
195 participants in 3 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Wael sayed El Gharabawy, assisstant professor
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal