ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Augmentation in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Rush logo

Rush

Status

Completed

Conditions

Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear

Treatments

Procedure: Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Biological: Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02484950
15042702

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Mesenchymal stem cells promote tissue regeneration by differentiating into adult cell lines and by supplying growth factors to their implanted environment. They have been shown to be effective in improving both overall healing and tendon integrity in rotator cuff repair. This study will follow 100 patients in the United States and track their clinical outcomes for at least one year post-operatively.

Full description

Rotator cuff repair is one of the most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures in the United States, but re-tear remains a common long-term complication. This can lead to pain, decreased shoulder function, and the need for corrective surgery. Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to improve healing rates in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, primarily due to their retained ability to differentiate into several different adult cell lines, such as tenocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. MSCs further enhance the healing process by releasing growth factors into the local environment to promote tissue regeneration.

While MSC augmentation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has led to higher rates of healing and improved tendon integrity, there remains a paucity of data surrounding clinical improvement after the procedure. Outcomes such as post-operative strength, range of motion, and shoulder function have yet to be compared with standard rotator cuff repair. The incidence of post-operative persistent structural defects in the tendon after MSC augmentation must also be further elucidated.

Enrollment

62 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is determined to have a full thickness rotator cuff tear (1-3 cm) or partial tear converted to a full-thickness tear-on the pre-operative MRI scan or found arthroscopically-and is scheduled to undergo surgical repair
  • Written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Revision surgery
  • Irreparable tear or partial repair
  • Any patient lacking decisional capability
  • Subscapularis involvement

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

62 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Rotator cuff repair with stem cells
Experimental group
Description:
Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo bone marrow aspiration (from hip, proximal humerus or tibia) through a small incision prior to arthroscopy in the group undergoing MSC augmentation. They will then undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation.
Treatment:
Biological: Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair
Procedure: Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Rotator cuff repair without stem cells
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Subjects will undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique, without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells. To maintain patient blinding, all patients will receive a small incision around the site of expected bone marrow aspiration (hip, proximal humerus, or tibia), regardless of whether or not they receive bone marrow.
Treatment:
Procedure: Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Carla Edwards, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems