Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap (CCMMRCLDF)

Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre

Status: Completed

Conditions: Gingival Recession, Localized

Treatments: Procedure: root coverage

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03654339

kranthirecession

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study was conducted to assess the evaluation of micro and Macro surgical approach in the treatment of grade II gingival recessions using the laterally repositioned flap

Full description

In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients)

The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period

Enrollment: 30 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 20 to 50 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Age 20-50 yrs
• ClassII gingival recession
• Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
• Sufficient width of attached gingiva

Exclusion criteria

• Any systemic diseases and smokers
• ClassI,III&IV gingival recession
• Abnormal frenal attachments
• Interdental bone loss with tooth mobility

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: N/A

Interventional model: Single Group Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

30 participants in 1 patient group

experimental group

Experimental group

Description:

Group A-15 patients were allocated to the microsurgical group for root coverage. following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the microsurgical approach Group B-15 Patients were allocated to the conventional group for root coverage following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the macrosurgical approach

Treatment:

Procedure: root coverage