ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Milk Consumption and Blood Microbiome in Healthy Volunteers (MAMI)

Erasmus University logo

Erasmus University

Status

Begins enrollment this month

Conditions

Healthy

Treatments

Dietary Supplement: Milk product

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06944002
KICH2.V4P.22.015 (Other Identifier)
NL88008.078.24

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this study is to learn if cfDNA of milk-associated intestinal bacteria (MAIB) is detectable in the bloodstream. The primary question it aims to answer is:

  • Does milk consumption simultaneously increase the number of MAIB cfDNA counts in blood samples, as it does in fecal samples?

Researchers will compare cfDNA counts of MAIB to those of fecal samples to assess whether the blood microbiome is a valid measure of the gut microbiome, utilizing a self-developed bioinformatics pipeline.

Participants will:

  • Abstain from consuming any dairy products for ten days, followed by drinking milk for 7 consecutive days.
  • Provide blood and fecal samples before dairy abstinence, as well as at 0, 24, and 48 hours, and one week after the reintroduction of milk.

Full description

eDNA (ecological DNA) is a concept that is gaining popularity for making comprehensive descriptions of all organisms present in an ecosystem. Gut microbiomes can be considered a specific variant of eDNA. In theory, a description of the gut microbiome should contain all different kinds of microorganisms in our gastrointestinal tract, including bacteria, viruses, archaea, fungi and other organisms (e.g. worms and phages). In practice, making such descriptions is challenging because of spurious temporal changes and technical challenges (e.g. the commonly used 16S rRNA approach ignores many organisms). Nevertheless, making accurate descriptions is essential as it is generally accepted that the gut microbiome plays critical roles in maintaining host homeostasis and health.

To overcome the challenges in sampling the intestinal microbiome, most investigators currently rely on probing faeces. We have pioneered the field in developing improved technical approaches; for example, we previously performed a double-balloon endoscopic study in healthy volunteers to characterize this microbiome in its entirety. Problems with the faecal microbiome include its poor capture of the adherent flora (which seems the most relevant concerning human physiology), it is highly heterogeneous and can cause results to differ depending on which part of faecal samples was taken, and technological challenges, as many eukaryotes are quite resistant to DNA isolation protocols. Additionally, the faecal microbiome is dominated by diet, which can vary substantially from day to day in humans. For example, faecal material deriving from breakfast can have a significantly different microbiological composition compared to that derived from dinner. Hence, there is a call for alternatives.

The blood microbiome is a newly discovered way of probing the microbiome, integrating the colonization of all kinds of body sites, particularly the intestinal tract. It is speculated that the DNA fragments of various microorganisms enter the circulation through mechanisms that are yet fully understood. The gastrointestinal microbiome is considered a major source of blood microbiome, especially in the case of an impaired gut barrier, which can occur in various chronic diseases.

The description of the entire body of cell-free DNA fragments that derive from non-human origin is called the blood microbiome, even though it does not constitute living organisms, but rather their remnants. The blood microbiome signature has been reported as a predictable biomarker in differentiating patients with cancer from healthy individuals and even for distinguishing between different cancer types. However, the approach remains very controversial due to bioinformatical pitfalls. While we have invested substantial energy in resolving the issues involved, the field requires a formal proof-of-concept to progress. The current study is meant to provide this.

Enrollment

10 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • 18.5 =< BMI < 25 kg/m2
  • All genders included
  • Not be lactose intolerant
  • Willing to consume milk

Exclusion criteria

  • Regularly used medications such as antibiotics, steroids, beta blockers, and adrenergic- stimulating agents (self-report)
  • Regular use of prebiotic and/or probiotics apart from yogurt and young soft cheese (self-report)
  • Antibiotic intake in the previous months (self-report)
  • Daily consumption of more than 10 cigarettes (self-report)
  • Chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, fatty liver disease, cancer, or autoimmune disease (self-report)
  • Internal diseases, including those of the gastrointestinal tract, lung, heart, vasculature, liver, and kidney (self-report)
  • Eating disorder or unconventional eating habits (self-report)
  • Participation in another study (self-report)
  • Women: pregnancy and breastfeeding (self-report)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

10 participants in 1 patient group

Milk consumption
Experimental group
Description:
Milk consumption for 7 days
Treatment:
Dietary Supplement: Milk product

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Junhong Su, PhD; Prof. Dr. Maikel P. Peppelenbosch, MD, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems