ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

MindfulGarden in Treatment of Hyperactive Delirium in a Hospital Setting

S

Simon Fraser University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Hyperactive Delirium

Treatments

Device: MindfulGarden

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03621228
MindfulGarden-H-Pilot

Details and patient eligibility

About

This pilot study is designed to address feasibility for a larger randomized control clinical study that will determine the efficacy of exposure to the MindfulGarden - an interactive digital technology - in reducing hyperactive delirium in hospitalized older adults.

Full description

The primary objective of the study is to establish whether the key components necessary for conducting a full randomized control study in the future, such as recruitment, consent, randomization, and treatment processes are working well and all function together. As a secondary objective, the investigators will determine trends in patients exposed to MindfulGarden (MG), for example:

  1. At the first and second administration of the Confusion Assessment Method - short form (CAM) after admission to a medical ward are there more, the same or fewer patients in the intervention group than in the control group whose CAM scores change from positive to negative?
  2. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, did fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group experience significant events/alerts (e.g. aggressive/violent behaviours, falls, code white)?
  3. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, were fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group administered psychotropic drugs (e.g. haloperidol, risperidone, quetiapine, lorazepam)? were more, the same, or fewer administered sleeping aids (e.g. trazodone, melatonin)?
  4. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, were fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group physically restrained?
  5. Was mean length of stay from time of admission to a medical ward until discharge due to death, return to place of residence before admission or to a different place of residence longer, the same or shorter in the intervention than in the control group?
  6. Were there more, the same or fewer deaths or discharges to a higher level of care (e.g. to assisted living, to a complex care facility in patients who previously lived at home) in the intervention than the control group?

Additionally, to the extent that movement and vocalization are reflective of anxiety, agitation and/or aggression (i.e. responsive behaviours) the investigators also want to determine whether there is a correlation between changes in these as recorded by the MG and any of the indicators listed in 1-6 above.

Enrollment

24 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

65+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the Emergency Department who have a diagnosis of hyperactive delirium as defined by the short CAM

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with severe vision impairment or who are legally blind
  • Patients for whom a bed in a medical ward was not available within 12 hours of a diagnosis of hyperactive delirium (i.e. who remained in the Emergency Department more than 12 hours)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

24 participants in 2 patient groups

MindfulGarden
Experimental group
Description:
Standard care + exposure to an interactive digital device
Treatment:
Device: MindfulGarden
Control
No Intervention group
Description:
Standard care only

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Gloria Gutman, PhD; Fabio Feldman, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems