Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for PHC

Renyi Qin

Status: Completed

Conditions: Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Treatments: Other: No intervention

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05402618

TJDBPS10

Details and patient eligibility

About

Brief Summary: This is a multicentric, retrospective, real-world study to investigate the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), with the perioperative characteristics and long-term overall survival being compared. We aimed to find out whether the minimally invasive surgery is safe or feasible for PHC. And we also want to find out patients with what kind of characteristic can be benefit from the minimally invasive surgery compared with the open approach.

Enrollment: 783 patients

Sex: All

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Histologically confirmed PHC.

Exclusion criteria

1. Peritoneal seeding or metastasis to the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes, or distant sites;
2. Non-adenocarcinoma histology;
3. Incomplete clinical data.

Trial design

783 participants in 2 patient groups

minimally invasive surgery

Treatment:

Other: No intervention

open surgery

Treatment:

Other: No intervention