ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Mirror Neurons in Older Participants (MNOP)

University of Central Florida logo

University of Central Florida

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Muscle Weakness
Sarcopenia
Dynapenia

Treatments

Other: Action Observation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03946709
SBE-18-14657

Details and patient eligibility

About

A critical problem facing aging adults is muscle weakness. Whereas scientists have traditionally attributed the loss of muscle strength with aging to muscle atrophy, emerging evidence suggests that impairments in the neuromuscular system's ability to voluntarily generate force plays a more central role than previously appreciated. One area that has not yet been investigated includes the role that observing another's actions - thereby activating mirror neurons - plays in muscle force generation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the acute effects of action observation on muscular strength, voluntary muscle activation, and cortical excitability and inhibition in older adults.

Full description

A critical problem facing aging adults is muscle weakness. Whereas scientists have traditionally attributed the loss of muscle strength with aging to atrophic effects, emerging evidence suggests that impairments in the neuromuscular system's ability to voluntarily generate force plays a more central role than previously appreciated. One area that has not yet been investigated includes the role that observing another's actions - thereby activating mirror neurons - plays in muscle force generation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the acute effects of action observation on muscular strength, voluntary activation, and cortical excitability and inhibition in older adults. Following a thorough familiarization visit, twenty-five men and women ≥60 years of age will complete three action observation sessions in a randomized, counterbalanced manner: 1) observation of very strong hand/wrist contractions, 2) observation of very weak hand/wrist contractions, and 3) a control condition. Maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the wrist flexors will be performed before and after observation sessions. Percent voluntary activation will be determined via the interpolated twitch technique. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the flexor carpi radialis and first dorsal interosseous will be used to quantify cortical excitability and inhibition, via motor evoked potential amplitude and silent period duration, respectively. The hypothesis of this study is that observation of strong muscle contractions will acutely increase muscle strength, and such changes will be facilitated by enhanced corticospinal excitability and decreased inhibition. In contrast, it is hypothesized that observation of very weak contractions will cause no such efforts or even acute muscle weakness. Collectively, we propose that manipulation of mirror neurons is a worthwhile strategy for clinicians hoping to induce neuromuscular adaptations in older adults, particularly in settings where movement of a joint is painful or infeasible (e.g., bedrest or immobilization).

Enrollment

14 patients

Sex

All

Ages

60+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy men and women ≥60 years of age

Exclusion criteria

  • Neuromuscular disease (e.g. Parkinson's, MS, ALS)
  • Metabolic disease (e.g. diabetes, thyroid disorder, metabolic syndrome)
  • Arthritis in the upper limbs (hands, arms, shoulders)
  • Trouble using or controlling one's muscles
  • History of cancer
  • History of stroke
  • History of heart attack
  • Use of an assistive walking device or other mobility aids
  • Physician mandated contraindication to exercise within the last 6 months
  • Epilepsy or history of convulsions/seizures
  • History of fainting or syncope
  • History of head trauma that was diagnosed as concussion or was associated with loss of consciousness
  • History of hearing problems or tinnitus
  • Cochlear implants
  • Implanted metal in the brain, skull, or elsewhere in the body
  • Implanted neurotransmitter
  • Cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines
  • Medication infusion device
  • Past problems with brain stimulation
  • Past problems with MRI
  • Use of muscle relaxants or benzodiazepines
  • Allergy to rubbing alcohol
  • Any other health related illnesses that would prohibit a participant from physical performance testing
  • Lack of transportation to and from the laboratory

Trial design

Primary purpose

Basic Science

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

14 participants in 3 patient groups

Muscle strength condition
Other group
Treatment:
Other: Action Observation
Muscle weakness condition
Other group
Treatment:
Other: Action Observation
Control
No Intervention group

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems