Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The objective of the present study is to evaluate the appropriate route of administration of misoprostol, either oral or vaginal, for cervical priming to facilitate the procedure of office hysteroscopy and reduce patient discomfort to minimum
Full description
Sample size calculation was done using the comparison of pain sensation represented through VAS between oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before office hysteroscopy. As reported in previous publication (Sordia-Herna'ndez et al., 2011), the mean ±SD of VAS in oral misoprostol group was approximately 6.04 ± 1.5, while in vaginal misoprostol group was approximately 2.8 ± 1.2. Accordingly, we calculated that the minimum proper sample size was 23 women in each arm to be able to detect a real difference of 1 unit with 80% power at α = 0.05 level using Student's t test for independent samples. Sample size calculation was done using Stats Direct statistical software version 2.7.2 for MS Windows, StatsDirect Ltd., Cheshire, UK
However, the study population consists of 100 patients in reproductive age that requires diagnostic hysteroscopy for investigation of infertility or AUB.
The patients will be recruited from Office hysteroscopy clinic of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University from October 2017 to march 2018.
The Patients will be allocated equally into 2 groups ( each group contain 50 patients)
Groups will be as follows:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Contraindicating the use of prostaglandins such as:-
Contraindication to office hysteroscopy such as:-
Neurological disorders affecting the evaluation of pain.
Previous cervical surgery.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sarah M Hassan, lecturer
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal