ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE)

A

Al-Azhar University

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Maxillary Retrusion
Nasal Airway Obstruction

Treatments

Device: MSE 2 bands and 4
Device: CH 4 band
Device: HH 2 bands

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05446714
Ahmed (Other Identifier)
lecturer
775/220

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aim of the study: To compare radiographically the morphometric changes in the nasal airway after using three types of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) conventional hyrax (CH), hybrid hyrax (HH) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Full description

Abstract Aim of the study: To compare radiographically the morphometric changes in the nasal airway after using three types of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) conventional hyrax (CH), hybrid hyrax (HH) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Material and Methods: A total sample of thirty CBCT of patients presented with constricted maxilla with mean age of 14±3Y was randomized in to three groups. Group 1 CH, group 2 HH and group 3 MSE.

CBCT records were taken before(T1) and after six months (T2) of RME; the Airway was segmented and quantified using software (version 5.3.4.39USA).

Enrollment

54 patients

Sex

All

Ages

11 to 18 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background
  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
  • Patients with reduced or average anterior face height.
  • Patients with no periodontal disease.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
  • No systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with erupted maxillary permanent first molars and premolars.
  • Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous treatment
  • syndromes
  • cleft lip and palate

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Quadruple Blind

54 participants in 3 patient groups

conventional hyrax
Active Comparator group
Description:
CH 4 BANDS for expansion of maxilla and observation improvement of the air way
Treatment:
Device: CH 4 band
Hybrid hyrax
Active Comparator group
Description:
HH 2 BANDS for expansion of maxilla and observation improvement of the air way
Treatment:
Device: HH 2 bands
Maxillary skeletal expander
Active Comparator group
Description:
MSE 2 BANDS AND 4 for expansion of maxilla and observation improvement of the air way
Treatment:
Device: MSE 2 bands and 4

Trial documents
2

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems