Motivational Interviewing to Enhance Advance Care Planning for Older Adults and Caregivers After Emergency Visits
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention in enhancing advance care planning (ACP) among older adults who have visited the Emergency Room (ER) in the past six months and their family caregivers. The main question it aims to answer is: The effectiveness of the MI-based ACP intervention implemented within six months of an ER visit on improving older adults' advance directives (AD) completion rate.
Compared to participants in the control group who will only receive a self-education booklet, participants in the intervention group will receive a motivational interview educational intervention to see the effectiveness of an MI-based ACP intervention implemented within six months following an emergency room visit regarding the completion of AD for older adults.
Full description
Targeted issue: At present no feasible method exists to empower older adults following ER visits to engage in ACP in Hong Kong.
Population: The target group will be dyads comprising older adults who have had ER visits within the previous six months and their family caregivers.
Intervention: An MI-based ACP intervention our team developed.
Main study aim: To investigate the effectiveness of an MI-based ACP intervention implemented within six months following an emergency room visit on completion of AD for older adults compared to a self-education group.
Study method: Investigators will recruit eligible participants from two largest public hospitals, including the geriatric outpatient clinic of Queen Mary Hospital (IRB Ref: UW23-402) and the accident & emergency department of Queen Elizabeth Hospital (IRB Ref: KC/KE-23-0058/ER-1). A parallel RCT (allocation ratio= 1:1) with a post-trial qualitative study will be adopted and three follow-up time points at 3-, 6- and 12-month post-intervention. Participants in the intervention group will receive a motivational interview educational intervention, while participants in the comparison group will receive the pictorial ACP educational booklet for self-learning only. Completion of AD and health service utilization will be assessed at three follow-up time points. In addition, a post-intervention interview, regarding stakeholders' views on the relevance, effectiveness, and experience of the intervention., will be conducted.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The target group will be dyads comprising older adults who have had ER visits within the previous six months and their family caregivers. A dyad is defined as one older adult and one primary family caregiver of the older adult.
For older adults:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 65 or older
- At least one episode of ER visit in the last six months
- Has a family caregiver to be present during the intervention
- Able to communicate in Chinese
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has completion of an AD
- Moderate to severe cognitive impairment or diagnosis of dementia, as identified in health records
- Communication problems (e.g., deafness or aphasia)
For family caregivers:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 or above
- Immediate or extended family member or friend nominated by an eligible older adult participant as primary caregiver
- Able to communicate in Chinese
Exclusion Criteria:
- Moderate to severe cognitive impairment
- Communication problems (e.g., deafness or aphasia)
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
376 participants in 2 patient groups
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Tongyao Wang, PhD; Chia-Chin LIN, PhD,FAAN,RN
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal