Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized clinical trial compares tannic acid-zinc acetate mucoadhesive gel with lidocaine gel for reducing gag reflex in children aged 8-10 years during radiographic dental examination Gag reflex severity and pulse rate will be assessed before and after gel application. The study evaluates the effectiveness of the tested gel as a potential alternative to lidocaine.
Full description
This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of a tannic acid-zinc acetate mucoadhesive gel compared to lidocaine gel in reducing gag reflex in children aged 8-10 years during dental procedures. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either gel applied to the posterior palate before a standardized gag-inducing procedure. The primary outcome is the reduction in gag reflex severity using a validated scoring index. The secondary outcome is the change in pulse rate measured at baseline, after application, and during the procedure. This study aims to assess whether the tested mucoadhesive gel can provide an effective alternative to lidocaine with improved patient comfort.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
66 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Sara Usama Elkholy, Dental degree; Mohamed Atef Abdelhakim, Dental
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal