Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Despite these revolutionary changes in the laboratory, little has changed with the process of embryo transfer (ET). A study to prospectively evaluate the role of cervical mucus removal prior to embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in ART will be undertaken.
Full description
ET involves placing the embryo(s) obtained before assisted reproduction technology (ART) into the uterus via a catheter advanced through the cervical canal. Yet this is the final, and in some respects the most critical, process in the sequential events that encompass an ART cycle. If an embryo cannot be delivered to the uterine cavity atraumatically and in a location for optimal implantation, the steps of ovarian hyperstimulation, oocyte retrieval, embryo culture, and embryo selection will have no benefit. Contamination of the catheter with blood may be a marker for difficult ET and has also been linked to poor ET outcomes. When retrospectively assessing outcomes, Goudas et al. (1) demonstrated a clinical pregnancy rate of 50% with no blood, and this rate fell by half when a small amount of blood was noted on the catheter tip. Pregnancy rates fell even further, to 10%, when there was a significant amount of blood (1). Similarly, in a preliminary study, blood or mucus on the tip was associated with a significantly lower pregnancy outcome (2). Blood and mucus were associated with an increased risk for unsuccessful transfers with odds ratios of 1.9 and 1.8, respectively. Although all these data suggest a possible role of cervical mucus in embryo transfer, there is no clinical evidence on the effect of removal of cervical mucus on the outcome of IVF/ICSI. In view of this uncertainty, a study to prospectively evaluate the role of cervical mucus removal prior to embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in ART will be undertaken. It is hypothesized that removal of cervical mucus will achieve higher clinical pregnancy rates.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,118 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal