Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To assess the efficacy and safety of a percutaneous ablation strategy that targets multiple extrapulmonary structures as the Cox-Maze IV.
Full description
Persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation (PsAF and LSAF) remain significant clinical challenges, particularly in patients with heart failure or high comorbidity burden, where the arrhythmia is often more sustained, complex, and resistant to conventional ablation approaches. Despite advancements in ablation technology, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone has shown limited success in this subgroup. Current guidelines acknowledge the need for additional ablation targets beyond the pulmonary veins (PVs), yet evidence remains scarce and optimal strategies undefined.
This single-arm, prospective pilot study investigates a novel ablation strategy that combines multi-target pulsed field ablation (PFA) with both endocardial intracavitary electrogram (EGM) mapping and non-invasive body surface mapping (BSM) to guide the identification and ablation of extra-PV atrial fibrillation drivers. This approach is designed to emulate the multilevel strategy of the surgical Cox-Maze IV, aiming for comprehensive arrhythmia substrate modification while minimizing procedural risk.
The PFA+ADM protocol leverages recent advances in:
Study Workflow
After informed consent, participants will undergo implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) to allow for continuous AF burden tracking. The ablation procedure includes:
Technical Specifics and Rationale
Rationale for Multitarget Approach:
Atrial remodeling in patients with PsAF/LSPsAF is often diffuse and multifocal. Standard PVI addresses the initiating triggers of paroxysmal AF but fails to control perpetuating mechanisms in persistent forms. The multitarget strategy aims to:
Advantages of PFA Technology:
PFA uses irreversible electroporation to ablate cardiomyocytes without significant collateral damage. This is especially relevant when targeting extrapulmonary sites near vulnerable structures (e.g., posterior wall near esophagus, Bachmann's bundle near the aorta). Additionally, PFA has demonstrated faster lesion creation and potentially shorter procedure times with comparable or superior efficacy in preclinical and early clinical data.
Integration of ECGi and EGM-based Mapping:
Simultaneous use of non-invasive ECG imaging and invasive mapping enables comprehensive localization of potential drivers, enhancing ablation precision. The goal is to improve arrhythmia control without significantly increasing procedural complexity or risk.
Patient Profile and Unmet Needs:
This trial targets patients often excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials-those with heart failure or multiple comorbidities who have higher recurrence rates post-ablation. These patients also tend to have more advanced atrial myopathy and may benefit from a more aggressive substrate modification strategy, if delivered safely.
Data Handling and Interim Analysis
Data will be collected prospectively, including electrogram recordings, ECGi maps, procedural data, imaging, and follow-up rhythm status. An interim analysis is planned after the first 25 patients to evaluate safety and refine the mapping-ablation workflow if necessary. Data from ICMs will be analyzed to calculate daily AF burden, detect arrhythmia recurrence, and correlate clinical outcomes with procedural findings.
Safety is evaluated both acutely and in follow-up, with predefined thresholds for major complications (≤5%). The use of PFA is expected to significantly reduce thermal injury risks. Procedural metrics such as total duration, fluoroscopy time, and energy delivery time will also be recorded.
This pilot study will serve as a foundation for larger multicenter trials by assessing the feasibility and clinical benefit of this precision-guided, multitarget ablation strategy in a high-risk AF population. Its results may help redefine ablation endpoints beyond pulmonary vein isolation and facilitate the integration of novel technologies into routine clinical practice.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
50 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Gonzalo Ricardo Ríos-Muñoz, MSc, PhD; Angel Arenal, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal