Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The hypothesis of the present study is that restoring nasal stimulation alleviates dyspnea and improves respiratory drive. The aim of this study is to compare three non-pharmacological approaches designed to restore nasal stimulation (continuous nasal airflow, nasal sprays, and facial airflow) in tracheotomized patients dependent on mechanical ventilation.
Full description
Nasal stimulation is generated by breathing, which enables olfaction and helps to rhythm brain activity. The loss of nasal stimulation in tracheotomized patients who are dependent on mechanical ventilation may negatively affect respiratory drive and contribute to dyspnea. Restoring nasal airflow therefore emerges as an attractive non-pharmacological approach to treat dyspnea in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation weaning.
The hypothesis of the present study is that restoring nasal stimulation alleviates dyspnea and improves respiratory drive. The aim of this study is to compare three non-pharmacological approaches designed to restore nasal stimulation (continuous nasal airflow, nasal sprays, and facial airflow) in tracheotomized patients dependent on mechanical ventilation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
24 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Martin DRES, MD PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal