Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will compare the novel methods of NS and BS with the standard technique of nasophayngeal aspiration (NPA) and routine ETT suction. We shall assess the samples for diagnosis of RSV, viral load and immune responses in the airways of babies with RSV infection. We shall also assess the genetics of babies included in this study, to see if they may be vulnerable to RSV infection.
Full description
In conjunction with a specialist medical device manufacturing company (Hunt Developments (Midhurst, West Sussex) we have produced novel nasosorption and bronchosorption kits that have CE marking. Both nasosorption and bronchosorption methods use synthetic absorptive matrix (SAM) strips: that look and feel like blotting paper, and will be placed onto the mucosal surface. These are comfortable to use and can be used at frequent intervals over extended periods of time. This non-invasive technique is ideal for infants and children, and it is possible to obtain neat mucosal lining fluid (MLF) even from normal healthy noses. The eluates contain cytokines and chemokines at high detectable levels on multiplex immunoassay.
We would like to use these SAMs to take MLF samples from the nasal and bronchial mucosal surfaces to see if these novel techniques can overcome the problems with current sampling methods. We plan to use these absorption techniques to measure RSV viral load. We also aim to look at the immune response in terms of the anti-viral interferon response (IFN-γ, IFN-λ, IFN-α2a, IP10, ITAC). In therapeutic studies in the future, it may be possible to document levels of drug (pharmacokinetics) in nasal MLF.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Group 1 and Group 2
Inclusion Criteria
OR • Documented RSV infection, admitted to the paediatric wards at St Mary's Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria
Group 3
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Control Group 1 Inclusion criteria
• Babies, aged 2 weeks-24 months, attending routine outpatient appointments or undergoing elective surgical procedures.
Exclusion criteria
Control Group 2
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
152 participants in 5 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal