Nasal Versus Buccal Oxygen Administration for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Lung Diseases

Treatments

Other: nasal oxygen

Other: buccal oxygen

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04686656

tayfun1

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to compare to nasal and buccal oxygen administration in patients undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration .

Full description

Anesthesia for Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) may be range from routine bronchoscopy sedation to general anesthesia. During sedation to EBUS increased duration of anesthesia and sedative dosing put patients at increased risk for hypoxic events. To avoid this, oxygen supplementation is mandatory. There are different techniques for oxygen supplementation during the procedure. At this study we will compare to nasal and buccal oxygen supplementations during EBUS.

Enrollment

60 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

patients ≥18 years of age
body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 30
American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

congestive heart failure
ischemic heart disease
increased intracranial pressure
known allergy or contraindication to study drugs (propofol, fentanyl, or midazolam)
an anatomical feature precluding adequate positioning of the buccal device.