Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
RATIONALE: Effective screening tests should help doctors detect lung cancer early and plan curative treatment. It is not yet known whether low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) screening is more effective than chest radiography (CXR) screening in reducing death from lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of LDCT scan with that of CXR in screening individuals who are at high risk for developing lung cancer.
Full description
OBJECTIVES:
OUTLINE:
NLST participants were randomized to either low-dose helical CT or chest x-ray in equal proportions. A total of 53,454 participants were enrolled (26,722 in low-dose CT and 26,732 in chest radiography) at 33 screening centers across the United States. Screening was offered three times (at baseline and two annual follow-up examinations). The primary endpoint of the study was lung cancer mortality. The study arms were compared with regard to overall mortality, lung cancer incidence, and screening-related complications.
All low-dose scanners and chest x-ray machines were certified for use and met NLST protocol requirements and American College of Radiology guidelines. Low-dose CT acquisitions and chest radiographs were interpreted by trained radiologists. Participants and their health care provider were informed of study examination results. Participants with abnormalities suspicious for lung cancer were contacted for information regarding diagnostic evaluation. Medical records were collected on diagnostic evaluation, medical complications, and initial treatment.
Participants were then contacted at least annually by mail or telephone.
The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) represents the union of two NCI-sponsored efforts, the NCI Lung Screening Study and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
53,454 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal