ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Natural Cycle vs Programmed Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer

I

Indira IVF Hospital Pvt Ltd

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Preeclampsia and Eclampsia
Infertility
Frozen Embryo Transfer

Treatments

Procedure: Artificial Cycle
Procedure: Natural Cycle

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05716139
IIHPL-UDR/RCT/013_2022

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this[ type of study: randomized controlled trial]is to compare Preeclampsia following Natural vs. Artificial Cycle in patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer.

The main question[s] it aims to answer is

• Does NC-FET decreases the incidence of preeclampsia in patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer as compared to AC-FET ?

The main objective is to compare the proportion of preeclampsia in women with a viable pregnancy with natural cycle protocol to artificial cycle protocol when practicing frozen embryo transfer. Participants recruited will be divided into two ARM(1513 per arm). ARM 1 will undergo the Natural Cycle procedure of Embryo transfer, and ARM 2 will undergo the Artificial Cycle procedure of Embryo transfer. The primary outcome will be the proportion of preeclampsia. The duration of the study is around 2 year.

Full description

The Research question(PICO) addressed is Does NC-FET decreases the incidence of preeclampsia in patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer as compared to AC-FET . The hypothesis taken is NC-FET will decrease the incidence of preeclampsia compared to AC-FET. The sample size is taken as 3026 (1513 per arm). The Primary Objective is to compare the proportion of preeclampsia in women with a viable pregnancy with natural cycle protocol to artificial cycle protocol when practicing frozen embryo transfer. The study outcome of the proportion of preeclampsia after 20 weeks of gestation or 6 weeks post-delivery. There are two arms-Arm 1 Active Comparator: Natural Cycle and Arm 2 control: Artificial Cycle FET. The Randomization is done through Random Allocation as per computer generated sequence. The Blinding/masking is done Open labeled. The Study Duration is from Feb 2023 to Jan 2025. Participation Duration is 10 months.

Enrollment

172 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

21 to 45 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Endometrial preparation with Hormone replacement therapy/ Natural cycle.
  • Age 21-45 years following an autologous IVF cycle (with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy)
  • BMI > 18 and < 30 kg/m2
  • Endometrial thickness ≥ 7 mm after estrogen therapy or on the day of ovulation
  • Blastocyst embryo transfer

Exclusion criteria

  • Uterine diseases (e.g. submucosal fibroids, polyps, previously diagnosed Müllerian abnormalities)
  • Hydrosalpinx untreated.
  • Recurrent pregnancy loss (≥ 3 previous miscarriages)
  • Recurrent implantation failure (≥ 3 previously failed embryo transfers of good-quality blastocysts)
  • Allergy to study medication
  • Pregnancy or lactation at recruitment
  • Contraindications for hormonal treatment

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

172 participants in 2 patient groups

Natural Cycle
Active Comparator group
Description:
In this,hCG trigger and Luteal Phase Support is monitored for the natural frozen embryo cycle procedure of IVF.
Treatment:
Procedure: Natural Cycle
Artificial Cycle
Other group
Description:
In this, endometrial preparation and Luteal Phase Support is monitored for the artificial frozen embryo cycle procedure of IVF.
Treatment:
Procedure: Artificial Cycle

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Nikolaos P. Polyzos, MD; Nihar Ranjan Bhoi, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems