ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care Dressing (Prevena)

U

University of Toledo Health Science Campus

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Treatments

Device: Negative pressure wound therapy
Other: standard care dressing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03566641
Prevena V. 11/14/17

Details and patient eligibility

About

A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of standard care dressing

Full description

The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena) and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic and general surgery patients.

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Consent for participation from the patient or his legal representative

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently infected wounds
  • Patients with history of immunosupression
  • Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Prevention

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

0 participants in 2 patient groups

Negative pressure wound therapy
Experimental group
Description:
This group of patients will receive negative pressure wound therapy (prevena) as their postoperative wound care method.
Treatment:
Device: Negative pressure wound therapy
standard care dressing
Active Comparator group
Description:
This group of patients will receive standard care dressing as their postoperative wound care method.
Treatment:
Other: standard care dressing

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems