Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Invasive bladder cancer is managed with neoadjuvant therapy followed by bladder removal (cystectomy). Research shows that approximately 40% of patient will have no remaining cancer left in their bladder after completion of the initial systemic treatment, and perhaps could have avoided the surgery. However, currently physicians lack the ability to identify these patients.
The investigators believe that by using advanced imaging (MRI), bladder biopsies and novel biomarkers that detect tumor DNA in blood, they can better identify participants without any remaining cancer after chemotherapy. This will make active surveillance of these participants safer. In this study, participants without evidence of residual cancer will be randomized to active surveillance vs conventional bladder treatment (bladder removal, or chemo-radiation of the bladder). This study will be a pilot randomized control trial (RCT), and if successful, it will transition to a larger phase 3 RCT.
Full description
Purpose To assess the feasibility to randomize patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who experience a complete clinical response (cCR) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), as defined by negative ctDNA, negative bladder MRI and negative repeat TURBT to active surveillance vs standard of care (SOC) with definitive bladder treatment.
Hypothesis The hypothesize is that the combination of bladder re-staging with MRI, repeat biopsy and the use of ctDNA will markedly enhance the ability to identified participant who achieve an excellent response to NAT (cCR) and who could safely be offered AS.
Justification:
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC), or alternatively in selected patient, a combination of chemo-radiation (trimodal therapy, TMT), are the current standards of care for treatment of MIBC. However, both have significant potential toxicity that can impact quality of life. Clinical trials have demonstrated that up to 38% of patients have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to NAT. Those patients could potentially avoid RC or TMT. Unfortunately, the clinical tools to predict pCR are still considered inadequate and definitive local therapy is advised. Retrospective data and now prospective phase 2 trials have reported promising outcomes in selected patients undergoing active surveillance. A prospective randomized trial is still lacking to ensure non-inferiority of active surveillance over the standard of care.
Primary Objectives:
Research design:
Multi-center, phase II/III, open label randomized clinical trial
After enrolment, participants will received SOC NAT. Blood and urine specimens will be collected before or at cycle 1 day 1 of NAT. Participants will undergo conventional restaging during NAT, recommended to be done at the end of cycle 2. Conventional imaging consists of computerized tomography (CT) scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis to rule-out local or distant progression on treatment. Participants who have successfully completed the full regimen of SOC NAT, and have not been found to have progression and/or metastasis on their SOC CT scan, will then undergo the following intervention for the "clinical restaging" (CRS) (must be completed within 4 weeks after last dose of NAT):
Definition of clinical complete response (cCR):
Participants with cCR will then be randomized to either active surveillance or definitive bladder treatment (DBT) (RC or TMT, according to patient/physician choice). Participants who do not meet all criteria of cCR will proceed with SOC and have RC or TMT under the treating investigator's care.
Participants will adhere to the following schedule of surveillance:
Cystoscopy with urine cytology (for those with preserved bladder) every 3 months for 2 years. After 2 years, follow up schedule is at the discretion of the treating physician.
Repeat chest-abdomen-pelvis imaging with CT/MRI and ctDNA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. After 2 years, follow up schedule is at the discretion of the treating physician.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
688 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Marie-Pier St-Laurent, MD; Peter Black, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal