Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesenteric excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy was the standard of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in the past two decades. The main obstacles for improving survival benefit of LARC was distant metastasis. Recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) had been recommended as new preferred option for LARC. Induction chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI followed by CRT or short-course radiotherapy followed by FOLFOX chemotherapy had improved survival benefit for LARC.
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy had also been explored in pMMR patients with CRC. In the NICHE trial, neoadjuvant therapy with 2 dose of nivolumab and 1 dose of ipilimumab led to 29% of pathological response and 13% of pCR. Cadonilimab (AK104) was a PD-1/CTLA-4 bi-specific antibody. Here, we tried to explore the efficacy of Neoadjuvant Treatment With mFOLFOXIRI with or without Cadonilimab (AK104) Versus mFOLFOX6 in LARC.
Full description
This study was a prospective, randomized, uncontrolled phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI combined with AK104 neoadjuvant therapy versus mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant therapy in LARC.
The inclusion criteria: locally advanced colon cancer (T3>5mm or T4 on enhanced CT assessment, with distant metastasis excluded); Locally advanced rectal cancer (pelvic MR assessment as stage ii-iii, less than 12cm from the anal margin, no distant metastasis).
Group A: mFOLFOXIRI combined with Cadonilimab (AK104) for 6 cycles before surgery
Group B: 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 before surgery
Group C: 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI before surgery
Group D (exploratory cohort): mFOLFOXIRI combined with Cadonilimab (AK104) and fruquintinib for 3 months before surgery (not for randomised)
All groups were re-evaluated after 3 cycles and 6 cycles of treatment. If surgery was feasible after multidisciplinary evaluation, TME resection was performed, and adjuvant treatment was performed according to standard treatment after operation. For locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative pelvic enhanced MRI was used to evaluate tumor regression after 6 cycles of preoperative treatment. For patients who still had MRF+ and/or T4 after treatment, additional short-course radiotherapy was allowed.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Aged 18-70;
Colorectal adenocarcinoma with definite histological evidence;
ECOG Performance status score is 0-1
Colon cancer was evaluated as T3>5mm or T4 by contrast-enhanced CT examination of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, and distant displacement was excluded; Rectal cancer was graded as T3-4 and/or N+ by pelvic contrast-enhanced MRI examination, and the lower margin of the tumor was less than 12cm away from the anal margin. Distant metastasis was excluded by chest, abdomen and pelvis CT.
The primary rectal tumor was assessed as complete resections by a multidisciplinary collaboration group on colorectal cancer, including at least 2 gastrointestinal surgeons and 1 radiologist;
No previous systemic antitumor therapy for colorectal cancer, including cytotoxic drugs, immunotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, etc.;
Adequate organ function based on the following laboratory test values obtained within 7 days prior to treatment:
Hemoglobin ≥90g/L, neutrophil count ≥1.5×109/L, platelet count ≥75×109/L, serum total bilirubin ≤1.5× upper limit of normal value (UNL), aspartate transferase ≤2×UNL, alanine transferase ≤3×UNL, serum creatinine ≤1.5×UNL;
Willing and able to comply with research protocols and visit plans.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
143 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jianwei Zhang, Ph.D; Yanhong Deng, Ph.D
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal