ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates

C

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
Low Birth Weight Infants
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Treatments

Device: RAM Cannula
Device: Binasal Prong CPAP

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02168257
47575 (Other Grant/Funding Number)
1303-032

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.

Enrollment

8 patients

Sex

All

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Low Birth Weight Infant
  • Currently on continuous positive aireway pressure of 5-7 cm water pressure
  • Receiving continuous positive airway pressure support for > 24 hrs prior to enrollment
  • Fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of 23-50%

Exclusion criteria

  • Fraction of inspired oxygen > 50%
  • Congenital defects of head, pulmonary or cardiovascular systems
  • Chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes
  • Invasive Surgical Procedure within 24 hrs prior to enrollment
  • Enrollment in separate clinical trial that has ongoing data collection

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

8 participants in 2 patient groups

RAM Cannula CPAP
Experimental group
Description:
CPAP provided by RAM Cannula
Treatment:
Device: RAM Cannula
Binasal Prong CPAP
Active Comparator group
Description:
CPAP provided by binasal prong
Treatment:
Device: Binasal Prong CPAP

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems