Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate alternative less invasive sampling methods for the analysis of the endometrial microbiome. For that, vaginal swab and endometrial fluid samples will be assessed in comparison with the standard sampling method (an endometrial biopsy), in women aged 18-50 years on an oocyte donation program and/or who attend the clinic for routine gynecological controls, and whose samples will be collected during the secretory phase of a natural menstrual cycle. The study aims to:
Participants will undergo a sampling round (of the 3 sampling methods), and then a second round 1, 2 or 3 months later, as assigned by the investigator.
Full description
The endometrium plays a pivotal role in reproductive health, influencing processes such as implantation and pregnancy. Although the endometrium has generally been considered a tissue free of bacteria, numerous studies have documented the presence of an endometrial microbiome mainly composed of different species from the Lactobacillus genus. The presence of pathogenic bacteria has been shown to disrupt the uterine environment, affecting implantation rates and pregnancy success.
Traditional and emerging sampling methods allow for the study of the microbial profile of the endometrium, but the efficiency and representativeness of these techniques vary. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effectiveness, accuracy, and usefulness of three different sampling methods for microbiome analysis: endometrial biopsy, endometrial fluid, and vaginal swab. Additionally, it seeks to compare the endometrial microbial profiles with the vaginal microbiome to assess whether it may provide indirect information about the upper reproductive tract.
Endometrial biopsy is a gynecological procedure routinely performed in the clinical practice to provide the patient with an analysis of their microbiome before embryo transfer, ensuring that it is carried out in a non-pathological endometrium, especially in patients with previous implantation failures. It is considered the standard for uterine lining sampling but is an invasive technique that, due to the discomfort associated with the procedure itself, may not always be feasible. Endometrial fluid is a less invasive method that offers a potential alternative by collecting cells from the endometrial surface. On the other hand, studying the vaginal microbiome, although it may provide insight into reproductive outcomes, may not accurately reflect the microbiome of the uterine cavity, a key location where implantation and pregnancy occur. By using comprehensive microbiome analysis techniques, this study will assess the microbial populations collected by each method and determine the efficiency and usefulness of each sampling technique.
Through direct comparison, this research aims to establish a clearer understanding of how sampling techniques can impact microbiome analysis in the context of reproductive health. The results obtained could have significant implications for clinical practice, potentially offering less invasive and more accurate methods to evaluate the endometrial microbiome. This study aims not only to redirect our approach to sampling the endometrial microbiome but also to improve our understanding of its role in female reproductive health. Furthermore, it would facilitate the assessment of potential correlations between the endometrial and vaginal microbiomes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Carlos Gómez De La Cruz, BSc MSc; Diana Valbuena, MD PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal