Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is designed to determine the safety and efficacy of non-operative antibiotic management of clinically diagnosed acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Enrolled patients will be randomised and an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be made via weighted minimisation, where half of the patients will receive non-operative management with intravenous Piperacillin with Tazobactam, while the other half will have an appendicectomy.
Full description
Appendicectomy for acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly performed paediatric emergency operations in Australia. This standard treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) has remained largely unchallenged since its introduction in the late nineteenth century, under the assumption that AUA progresses to perforation and thus complications should an operation be withheld. However, appendicectomy via laparoscopic or open approach is not without its risks.
Non-operative management (NOM) with antibiotics has been increasingly accepted as mainstay therapy for many intra-abdominal infections. In fact, children with appendicitis complicated by perforation, abscess or phlegmon formation are often preferentially treated non-operatively with antibiotic therapy, with or without percutaneous drainage. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that antibiotics are a safe and effective treatment for AUA in adults and there is growing evidence that NOM is safe and effective in children.
Primary objectives:
To determine the safety and efficacy of non-operative antibiotic management of clinically diagnosed likely AUA in children.
Secondary objectives:
This study will enrol 226 patients, age 5-16 years, with acute uncomplicated appendicitis at two tertiary children's hospitals. Allocation ratio of 1:1 will be made via weighted minimisation using the following criteria: age (5-8 years or 9-16 years), gender (male or female), and duration of symptoms (<48 or >48 hours).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: if one or more of the following is assessed to be present
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
226 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Susan Adams, MBBS; Jonathan Karpelowsky, MBBCh
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal