ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Vasospastic Angina Korean Registry (NAVIGATOR)

D

Dong-A University

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Spasm

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: Spasm positive
Diagnostic Test: Spasm negative

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03570671
NAVIGATOR

Details and patient eligibility

About

With regard to the characteristics of spasm segment, had been clearly described by other invasive imaging methods including intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. However, there is potential risk during these invasive procedures, such as severe myocardial ischemia or fatal arrhythmia.

Presently available imaging test for coronary artery disease in multi detector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) evaluation has high diagnostic accuracy to evaluate coronary artery stenosis. However, previous report assessing imaging findings or diagnostic accuracy of MDCTA in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) is lacking.

Full description

Previously investigators analyzed the characteristics of coronary spasm segment in an observational individual dataset, suspected VSA patients (n=20) underwent dual-acquisition of MDCTA (initial and intravenous nitrate injected CT imaging), the diagnostic accuracy showed sensitivity: 73%, specificity: 100%, positive predictive value: 100%, and negative predictive value: 56%.

Further study is necessary because previous analysis presented limited sample size and deficiency of healthy control.

Therefore, investigators hypothesis that dual-acquisition of MDCTA in noninvasive tool for coronary assessment provide more information of coronary characteristics, and the diagnostic efficacy would be non-inferior as compared with the invasive coronary imaging modality in coronary spasm-induced angina attacks.

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

20 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is onset of angina-like attack at rest, during effort, or during rest and effort.
  • Subject has chest pain between night and early morning.
  • Subject is scheduled to undergo MDCTA.
  • Subject is an acceptable candidate for CAG with an EG provocation test.
  • Cardiac condition: BP>90/60mmHg, ECG: sinus rhythm with regular, left ventricular ejection fraction>55%, and resting heart rate<100 beats/min.
  • Subject will be provided written informed consent.
  • Subject is willing to comply with study follow-up requirement.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has clinical evidence of acute coronary syndrome.
  • Subject has evidence of significant narrowing (>50% stenosis by CAG).
  • Subject has clinical evidence of cardiomyopathy or valvular heart disease.
  • Subject is hemodynamically unstable.
  • Subject has a history of PCI and CABG.
  • Subject is pregnant and/or breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant during the duration of the study.
  • Subject has known allergy to contrast medium.
  • Subject has renal insufficiency (serum creatine >2.5 mg/dl).

Trial design

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Allocation

Non-Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

90 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Spasm positive
Experimental group
Description:
Ergonovine-induced coronary spasm provocation test positive: defined as transient, total, or sub-total occlusion (\>90% stenosis) of a coronary artery with symptoms of myocardial ischemia (angina pain and ischemic ECG change).
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Spasm positive
Spasm negative
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
Suspected vasospastic angina subjects with negative ergonovine provocation test are considered as reference modality.
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Spasm negative

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Cai De Jin, MD; Moo Hyun Kim, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems