Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This clinical trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of two medications, norepinephrine and phenylephrine, in preventing hypotension during low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery (CD). Although low-dose spinal anesthesia combined with opioids is widely used to mitigate hypotension, the incidence remains unacceptably high. Thus, vasopressors remain essential in maintaining maternal blood pressure during these procedures.
In this study, 100 women were initially assessed, with 2 excluded. The remaining 98 were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of either norepinephrine or phenylephrine. During the follow-up process, 2 patients from each group were lost, resulting in 47 participants per group for final analysis.
The results showed that norepinephrine was significantly more effective, with a lower incidence of hypotension (14.9% vs. 42.6%). It also provided more stable heart rates with fewer episodes of bradycardia and less need for rescue medications. Both treatments were safe for the babies with comparable Apgar scores.
This study suggests that Norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min is more effective than phenylephrine at 0.25 mcg/kg/min in preventing hypotension during low-dose SA in CD, providing better hemodynamic stability and fewer episodes of bradycardia
Full description
Upon arrival in the operating room, the parturient was monitored using standard American Society of Anesthesiologists monitors, including electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and invasive arterial BP measurement. A large peripheral vein was cannulated using an 18-gauge intravenous catheter for the administration of fluids and medications. Baseline BP was determined by averaging three measurements taken 2 minutes apart in the supine position before SA. Low-dose SA was performed with 8 mg of bupivacaine (Marcain) combined with 20 mcg of fentanyl and 100 mcg of morphine (Opiphine). At injection, patients received 15 ml/kg of 0.9% saline IV and group-specific vasopressors:
Following SA, patients were placed in a 15° left lateral tilt and administered 4 mg of ondansetron and 4 mg of dexamethasone intravenously. The sensory block was assessed at 10 minutes; a block at or above the xiphoid was considered effective. After placental delivery, uterotonics were administered as prescribed by the obstetrician. Vasopressor infusion was stopped 5 minutes after delivery.
BP and heart rate (HR) were recorded every 2 minutes during the first 30 minutes after SA, then every 5 minutes until the end of surgery. Neonatal HR was monitored continuously, and Apgar scores were assessed at 1 and 5 minutes by a neonatologist.
Management of Hemodynamic Events and Bradycardia Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or a drop of more than 20% from baseline. Management involved increasing the vasopressor infusion rate by 20%, followed by administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg intravenously if the HR was ≥ 75 bpm, or ephedrine 6 mg IV if HR was < 75 bpm. The infusion rate was returned to baseline once SBP recovered to the target range (80-120% of baseline).
Severe hypotension (SBP < 60% of baseline) was treated using the same approach but with a higher dose of rescue vasopressors: phenylephrine 100 mcg IV or ephedrine 12 mg IV, depending on HR.
In cases of hypertension (SBP > 120% of baseline), the vasopressor infusion was reduced by 50%. If the SBP exceeded 130%, the infusion was temporarily stopped and reinitiated at 50% of the original dose once the SBP returned to the target range.
Bradycardia was defined as a HR of less than 60 bpm. Management of bradycardia was based on the patient's hemodynamic status. If bradycardia occurred without hypotension, the vasopressor infusion was temporarily discontinued, and if the HR recovered to ≥ 60 bpm, the infusion was resumed at 50% of the original dose. Persistent bradycardia (>3 minutes) was treated with atropine 0.5 mg IV, up to 3 doses. If bradycardia was associated with hypotension, ephedrine 6 mg IV was administered.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal