Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.
Full description
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with either the second generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance™) or a radiofrequency ablation technique with an irrigated ablation catheter (TactiCath™ Quartz) . A total of 128 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomized for either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation treatment. With both techniques, pulmonary vein isolation will be performed and confirmed by a circular mapping catheter. The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.Treatment success will be evaluated by using 12-lead electrocardiography and 7-day Holter recording.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
101 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal