ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Novel ERG for Detection of Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy

K

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy

Treatments

Diagnostic Test: Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic Test: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06035887
IRAS 317611

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the study is to investigate novel electroretinography (ERG) devices in the detection of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Two devices (the RETEval full-field and flicker ERG and UTAS multifocal ERG) will be evaluated in this study, comparing device outputs to standard of care screening tests, in groups of participants characterised by presence or absence of hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy.

Full description

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a widely used drug used to treat disorders of inflammation in the body with up to 320,000 people estimated to be on this drug in the UK alone. Retinopathy due to HCQ is a significant problem, necessitating yearly screening which can only realistically take place in hospital eye units where funding and capacity constraints limit the provision of services.

Electroretinography is a non-invasive method of testing for eye retinal problems, which works by flashing light (in certain patterns and brightness) into eyes and measuring the electrical response through fine wires placed on the eye surface or behind the eyelid, and is considered by many authors to be a gold-standard test to detect HCQ retinopathy. Their use has been limited due to the high expertise required to undertake and interpret tests, limited availability of testing, and high test burden, however newer electroretinography devices have been developed by a company called LKC Technologies, which are faster to perform, use leads placed on the skin (rather than the eye surface) which are more comfortable, easier to use by healthcare technicians, and can be done without the need for dilating eyedrops. The two devices being tested in this study are:

  • The RETEval = a handheld electroretinography testing device
  • The UTAS multifocal ERG = a trolley-mounted electroretinography testing device

These innovations may make testing far easier to develop in both hospital eye service, and potentially even general settings such as outpatient clinics, general practices, and optometrists. This study aims to evaluate the performance of devices to detect and classify participants in 4 main groups:

  • Normative control participants (n=35)
  • Patients taking HCQ but without retinopathy (n=35)
  • Patients taking HCQ with indeterminate features of retinopathy (also known as POSSIBLE retinopathy) (n=35)
  • Patients taking HCQ with definite retinopathy

Device outputs will be analysed and compared with masked graded screening results (incorporating spectral-domain macular optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence as standard, taken on the same visit) to generate device- and device-output-specific sensitivities and specificities. If a signal is found, the feasibility outcomes from this study will inform the study methodology and timelines for a larger trial if necessary.

Enrollment

140 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years

  2. HCQ groups:

    a. HCQ use >5 years for patients without any high-risk factors, or >1 year in patients with one or more high-risk factors for HCQ retinopathy, namely: i. Dose >5mg/kg per day actual body weight (ABW) ii. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60mls/min/1.73m2 iii. Concomitant tamoxifen use

  3. Control group:

    1. No prior HCQ exposure

Exclusion criteria

  1. Cataract grade ≥3 of any subtype
  2. Recent cataract surgery within 4 weeks of recruitment
  3. Significant media opacity or corneal disease including, but not limited to, corneal oedema, corneal scarring, keratoconus, previous corneal transplants, severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca (requiring the use of topical serum, immunosuppressive or analogous therapy, or procedural treatment).
  4. Significant macular co-pathology including, but not limited to, macular degeneration, macular scarring, cystic macular oedema (for any reason), staphyloma.
  5. Inherited retinal and/or macular dystrophies including colour vision deficiencies
  6. Active or previous posterior uveitis or pan-uveitis
  7. Aphakia
  8. High refractive error >6.00 dioptres
  9. Amblyopia
  10. Diabetes
  11. Retinal angiopathies including, but no limited to, retinal vein occlusion, retinal artery occlusion, ocular ischaemic syndrome, HIV retinopathy, Sickle cell disease, radiation retinopathy
  12. Visually significant surgical retinal disease including epiretinal membrane, macular hole, retinal detachment, retinal tear
  13. Previous retinal laser or intravitreal treatment
  14. Moderate or worse glaucoma
  15. Optic atrophy
  16. Photosensitive epilepsy
  17. Ungradable HCQ retinopathy screening images
  18. Periocular infection or rash (recruitment can be deferred until acute pathology has resolved)
  19. Unable or unwilling to undertake study activities
  20. Any active use or history of the following medications:

Amiodarone Canthaxanthin Deferoxamine Digoxin Ethambutol Interferon-alpha Melatonin Nefazodone Sildenafil Vigabatrin Chloroquine Quinine

Trial design

140 participants in 4 patient groups

Normative Controls
Description:
Age- and sex- matched normal controls
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic Test: Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
On Hydroxychloroquine, NO retinopathy
Description:
Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine without hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic Test: Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
On Hydroxychloroquine, POSSIBLE retinopathy
Description:
Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine with possible (indeterminate) hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic Test: Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
On Hydroxychloroquine, DEFINITE retinopathy
Description:
Participants over 18 years on hydroxychloroquine with definite hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy
Treatment:
Diagnostic Test: Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic Test: Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic Test: Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Dr Chan Ning Lee; Ophthalmology research inbox

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems