Status
Conditions
About
The study aims to assess the well-being and safety of worker-consumers in the food industry, focusing on nutrition, musculoskeletal disorders, and regulatory policies. It follows a "OneHealth" approach, emphasizing the connection between human, animal, and environmental health. The research evaluates the nutritional status of workers in the food-supply chain, analyzing food consumption in both workplace and domestic settings to identify deficiencies or excesses. Through clinical, nutritional, and psychological assessments-including oxidative stress levels, serotonin, quality of life, and emotional well-being-the study seeks to identify high-risk groups and gender differences, providing data-driven insights for personalized dietary recommendations and targeted interventions. Findings will contribute to national policies for improved workforce well-being, supporting best practices and interventions to enhance health, safety, and productivity in the agri-food sector. The results will serve as the foundation for specific guidelines that strengthen the sector's sustainability and regulatory clarity.
Full description
The study aims to assess, key health parameters in worker-consumers within the food-supply chain. The assessment will be performed during a single visit, assessing:
Secondary Objectives Identification of risk groups: based on nutritional assessments and oxidative stress levels, identifying worker groups at higher risk of developing health conditions due to poor dietary habits or exposure to stress factors.
Analysis of gender differences: Investigating potential gender-based variations in nutritional status, oxidative stress levels, and quality of life, to determine whether specific dietary or health recommendations are needed for men and women.
This study is designed as an exploratory investigation aimed at comparing two groups of individuals with distinct dietary habits and lifestyle patterns, particularly focusing on sedentary workers versus non-sedentary workers engaged in physically demanding tasks.
The number of worker enrolled will be 40 (20 sedentary workers vs 20 non sedentary workers). The sample size has been determined based on existing literature evidence, utilizing phase angle (Di Vincenzo, 2011) and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) (Campa, 2020) as key reference parameters. Statistical power analysis was conducted using G*Power (v.3.1.9.7), employing a two-tailed independent samples t-test, with a significance level (α) set at 0.05 and 80% statistical power.
Effect size estimates (Cohen's d) were as follows: Fat Mass (FM): 0.81 (estimated power 70.1% with 20 participants per group), Fat-Free Mass (FFM): 1.30 (power >95% with 20 participants per group), BIVA Vector Length (VL): 2.06 (power 80% with only 5 participants per group). The selected sample size is sufficient to detect significant differences in FFM and VL, while for FM, the statistical power remains slightly below 80%.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
40 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mariacristina Siotto, PhD; Irene G Aprile, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal