Objective Evaluation of Patients With Palmar Hyperhidrosis Submitted to Two Levels of Sympathectomy: T3 and T4.

University of Sao Paulo

Status: Completed

Conditions: Quality of Life; Hyperhidrosis

Treatments: Procedure: Video-assisted sympathectomy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT01140659

005/05

Details and patient eligibility

About

Compare the results obtained with video-assisted sympathectomy performed in two distinct levels ganglionic (third versus fourth thoracic ganglion) for the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis, through a blind randomized clinical trial using an objective method to measure the sweat before and after the operation.

Full description

Currently, the treatment of choice for treating palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) is video-assisted thoracic sympathectomy (VATS) . This minimally invasive technique has been well standardized and provides adequate results with low morbidity.

The main side effect of VATS is compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH). This is present in most cases and is considered the greatest cause of dissatisfaction. To reduce the risk of CH, various studies have been conducted to compare different levels of ganglion resection. These studies have been based on subjective quantification of sweating (assessment of sweating reported by patients) and on the application of quality-of-life questionnaires.

Recently, tests for the objective evaluation of sweating have been developed to quantify sweating among patients with various diseases, including PH. So far, there have not been any studies comparing the long-term results of thoracic sympathectomy on the third ganglion (G3) versus the fourth ganglion (G4)with objective evaluation to quantify sweating.

The present study was prospective, randomized and blinded, with the objective of comparing the results from VATS at two different resection levels: G3 versus G4. All the patients were followed over a one-year period, and their palmar sweating was quantified using a portable device (VapoMeter) to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL). In addition, CH was evaluated by applying a specific quality-of-life questionnaire.

Enrollment: 40 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 15 to 45 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Being determined to accomplish the procedure, because such a statement depends on the level of discomfort suffered by the patient.
• Absence of previous thoracic surgery.
• Concordance with the completion of informed consent.
• Preoperative normal, including chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, blood count, sodium, potassium, urea, creatinine, glucose and thyroid hormones.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with BMI> 25.
• Pregnancy.
• Younger than 15 and more than 45 years.
• Heart disease that may contraindicate the procedure (congestive heart failure, coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, symptomatic, acute myocardial infarction, etc.).
• Acute infections or chronic.
• Bleeding disorder.
• Neoplasms.
• Inflammatory diseases of pulmonary or pleural.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

40 participants in 1 patient group

Objective measurement of sweat

Other group

Description:

We selected 40 patients from February 2007 to May 2009. All participants were randomized into two groups of 20 patients (G3 and G4) and underwent the sympathectomy, being followed for 12 months. We used an objective method for measuring sweat, checking the "TEWL (transepidermal water loss) measured by the "VapoMeter", and evaluated the quality of life before and after the operation. Also studied were: incidence and intensity of the compensatory hyperhidrosis.

Treatment:

Procedure: Video-assisted sympathectomy