Status
Conditions
About
Surgery for digestive cancers is managed according to quality standards, validated by the scientific community. Despite the diffusion of these standards through the benchmarks of good practice, the results of the surgery remain disparate.
In many countries, this "inequality of opportunity" has justified the establishment of quality assurance systems to measure the results of surgery for one or more localizations of digestive cancer.
These surgical audit experiments have shown a positive, rapid and cost-effective impact on complication rates, recurrence rates and overall survival even in the absence of interventional measures. The data collected also helped to improve the management of subgroups of patients usually excluded from clinical trials.
In Morocco, the National Cancer Prevention and Control Plan provides for the establishment of a quality assurance system with the introduction of a system for monitoring and evaluating the care of patients. This pilot project is part of this framework, for the group of patients who are candidates for surgery for digestive cancers.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient whose surgical intervention is indicated for:
Patient whose surgical intervention is indicated for a progressive disease or a local recurrence proven or suspected of a digestive localization cancer having already been the resected (with the exception of situations of iterative liver resection for liver metastasis hepatic and recovery of the tumor bed after the discovery of vesicular cancer on cholecystectomy specimen)
Patients whose intervention is for diagnostic purposes without any curative or palliative intention
Patients whose surgery is a liver transplant
Patients whose surgical intervention is local destruction (radiofrequency, microwaves) exclusively by percutaneous approach (without laparotomy or laparoscopy)
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal