Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This randomized, crossover study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of a self-administered oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at home using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to a standard clinic-based OGTT. Participants with prediabetes will undergo both home-based and clinic-based OGTTs, with glucose levels measured via CGM and venous plasma glucose. The primary outcome is the correlation between CGM-based glucose values and standard OGTT results. Secondary outcomes include diagnostic agreement, metabolic hormone associations, and feasibility of home-based testing as a diagnostic tool for dysglycemia.
Full description
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and diagnostic utility of a self-administered oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at home using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to a standard clinic-based OGTT.
Study Design Type: Randomized, crossover study Participants: 75 adults with prediabetes Intervention: Each participant will complete both a home-based OGTT with CGM and a clinic-based OGTT with venous plasma glucose measurement.
Primary Objective To assess the correlation between glucose values obtained from a CGM-based home OGTT and a standard venous OGTT performed in the clinic.
Secondary Objectives Evaluate diagnostic agreement between CGM-derived and venous glucose measurements.
Assess variability in glucose responses between the two methods. Investigate associations between OGTT results and metabolic/sex hormones. Determine feasibility and patient adherence to home-based testing.
Methods Participants will be randomized into two groups: one starting with a clinic-based OGTT, the other with a home-based OGTT, followed by a crossover period. CGM will continuously monitor glucose responses, and standard venous plasma glucose measurements will serve as the reference method.
Clinical Relevance A validated home-based OGTT using CGM could improve access to glucose tolerance testing, reduce patient burden, and enhance early detection of dysglycemia.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
75 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Peder af Geijerstam, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal