Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effect of oliceridine versus sufentanil on the incidence of hypoxemia in adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation. The trial will compare the rates of hypoxemia (defined as SpO₂ ≤92%) between the two analgesic regimens when combined with propofol. The primary aim is to determine whether oliceridine can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia compared to sufentanil during endoscopic procedures.
Full description
Gastrointestinal endoscopy is frequently performed under deep sedation to minimize patient discomfort caused by mechanical stimulation. Currently, the combination of propofol and short-acting opioids, such as sufentanil, is widely used for its reliable sedation and analgesia. However, opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) remains a notable concern. Unlike traditional opioids, oliceridine is a synthetic μ-opioid receptor agonist that preferentially activates G protein pathways while substantially reducing β-arrestin pathway activation, which may lower the risk of opioid-related adverse events, including respiratory depression.
Previous studies suggest that oliceridine is as effective as morphine for pain control and may be associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects, particularly in elderly or obese surgical patients. Clinical data also suggest a lower risk of respiratory depression with oliceridine compared to traditional opioids, but the incidence of hypoxemia with oliceridine during real-world deep sedation remains unclear.
This study aims to enroll adult patients (aged ≥18 years, ASA I-III) scheduled for elective gastrointestinal endoscopy. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oliceridine (1 mg for gastroscopy or 1.5 mg for colonoscopy) or sufentanil (5 μg for gastroscopy or 7.5 μg for colonoscopy), both in combination with propofol (1-2 mg/kg). The primary outcome is the incidence of SpO₂ ≤92% from the start of sedation to the end of the procedure.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
508 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Shiyou Wei, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal